Survival outcomes in adult recipients using pediatric deceased donor liver grafts. A PSM analysis from the OPTN/UNOS liver transplant registry - 23/12/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.liver.2022.100135 
Paola A. Vargas a, Mohamad El Moheb a, Zachary Henry b, Nicolas Intagliata b, Feng Su b, Matthew Sttots b, Curtis Argo b, Shawn Pelletier a, Jose Oberholzer a, Nicolas Goldaracena a,
a Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800709, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0709, USA 
b Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Background

The use of pediatric donor grafts in adult recipients is a viable option to help address persistent organ shortages. Existing data is inconclusive regarding outcomes of pediatric-to-adult liver transplantation.

Materials and methods

Using the UNOS-STAR database, adults receiving a whole liver graft in the US between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received a graft from a pediatric-donor (≤12y) or an adult-donor (≥18y). The groups were further matched using propensity-score matching (PSM) in a 1:1 ratio. Liver grafts disposition trends from pediatric donors ≤12y, as well as usage patterns of these grafts for adult recipients across UNOS regions were analyzed. The primary outcomes of this study were graft and patient survival. Secondary outcomes included LOS and need for re-transplantation.

Results

There were 4,798 deceased donors ≤12 years during the study period. Of those, 3476 liver grafts were recovered for transplant, 203/3,476 were discarded and 3,273/3,476 transplanted. Twenty percent of those recipients were adults ≥18y. PSM created a cohort of 642 patients, (pediatric-donor group n = 321, adult-donor group n = 321). Survival analyses revealed no difference in graft survival (p = 0.64) or overall patient survival (p = 0.74) between pediatric-donor and adult-donor groups. Likewise, secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. Although not statistically significant, adults in the pediatric-donor group showed a trend toward higher rates of re-transplantation (4.4%) vs those in the adult-donor group (1.9%) (p = 0.07). A subgroup PSM analysis including only recipients with MELD score >18 further demonstrated comparable results including similar LOS, re-transplantation rates, graft failure (log-rank p-value = 0.57) and patient mortality (log rank p-value = 0.38).

Conclusion

Pediatric-to-adult liver transplantation could represent a safe and effective option in the event that a pediatric graft is available and declined by all potential pediatric recipients, particularly if performed under careful patient selection, and in centers with pediatric liver transplant and/or LDLT. Our results are in favor of utilizing pediatric-donor livers in adult patients since there is no significant difference in mortality or graft survival and could potentially increase organ utilization by avoiding discard of these grafts.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Graft survival, Patient survival, Propensity score matching, Outcomes, National registry

Abbreviations : CIT, GRWR, HAT, HCC, HCV, INR, LOS, MELD, NASH, PBC, PNF, UNOS


Plan


© 2022  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 9

Article 100135- février 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • What's in a name? Higher risks with donation after cardiac death than public health service increased risk livers
  • Danielle M. Tholey, Sarah Lopatin, Nitzan Roth, Gene Y Im
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The positive impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on organ utilisation in liver transplantation
  • Aarathi Vijayashanker, Varuna Aluvihare, Abid Suddle, Alberto Sanchez- Fueyo, Miriam Cortes Cerisuelo, Hector V Melendez, Wayel Jassem, Krishna V Menon, Nigel Heaton, Andreas Prachalias, Parthi Srinivasan

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.