S'abonner

Impact of recurrent pregnancy loss history on reproductive outcomes in women undergoing fertility treatment - 22/12/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.014 
Jiaxin Qiu, MD a, Tong Du, MD a, Wentao Li, PhD c, d, Ming Zhao, MD a, e, Dong Zhao, MD b, , Yun Wang, MD a, , Yanping Kuang, MD a, , Ben W. Mol, PhD c, f
a Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Richie Centre, The School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 
d JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 
e The Shanghai Towako Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China 
f Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 

Corresponding authors: Yanping Kuang, MD; Yun Wang, MD; Dong Zhao, MD

Abstract

Background

Recurrent pregnancy loss negatively affects the reproductive outcomes of natural conception. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies has been the focus of interventions in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. However, the risk of no embryos being available, high costs, and uncertainties surrounding its effectiveness limit its use. Factors beyond euploidy, such as an appropriate intrauterine environment, are also important for improving the reproductive outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. It remains unknown whether a history of recurrent pregnancy loss can affect reproductive outcomes after fertility treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the impact of history of recurrent pregnancy loss on the reproductive outcomes of women undergoing fertility treatment.

Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent their first frozen embryo transfer cycle or intrauterine insemination cycle between January 2014 and July 2020 in Shanghai, China. We excluded couples with known karyotypic abnormalities (eg, balanced translocation) or uterine malformation. We performed multivariate binary logistic regressions for biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates to investigate the associations between recurrent pregnancy loss history and reproductive outcomes.

Results

A total of 29,825 women who underwent frozen embryo transfer cycles and 5476 women who underwent intrauterine insemination cycles were included in this study. In those who underwent frozen embryo transfer, history of recurrent pregnancy loss was not significantly associated with biochemical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.63), miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–1.26), or live birth rates (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.79–1.06). Similarly, in frozen embryo transfer cycles that led to clinical pregnancy, recurrent pregnancy loss history was not significantly associated with live birth (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.28) or miscarriage rates (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.35). In women with intrauterine insemination, history of recurrent pregnancy loss showed no significant associations with fertility outcomes in all cycles ([adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–2.10] for live birth rate and [adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–4.01], for miscarriage rate) and in cycles that led to clinical pregnancy ([adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–1.63] for live birth rate and [adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–3.63] for miscarriage rate).

Conclusion

In women without obvious chromosome abnormality and uterine malformation who undergo fertility treatment, recurrent pregnancy loss history was not significantly associated with miscarriage and live birth rates, suggesting that it has little or no prognostic value in predicting the reproductive outcomes of frozen embryo transfer or intrauterine insemination cycles.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : fertility outcomes, frozen embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, intrauterine insemination, miscarriage risk, recurrent pregnancy loss


Plan


 J.Q., T.D., and W.L. are joint first authors.
 B.W.M. reports consultancy for ObsEva and research funding from Ferring and Merck. W.L. reports grants from the Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation outside the work of this study. Other authors declare no competing interests related to the study.
 This work was supported by the National Ministry of Technology (grant number 2018YFC1003000), the Elite Team Project of Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (grant number JY201801), Shanghai Sailing Program (grant number 21YF1423200), the Fundamental Research Program of the Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (grant number JYZZ117), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82201912, 31770989 and 82071615). B.W.M. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator grant (grant number 1176437). The funding sources had no involvement in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of the study.
 Cite this article as: Qiu J, Du T, Li W, et al. Impact of recurrent pregnancy loss history on reproductive outcomes in women undergoing fertility treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023;228:66.e1-9.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 228 - N° 1

P. 66.e1-66.e9 - janvier 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension
  • Holly E. Richter, Amaanti Sridhar, Charles W. Nager, Yuko M. Komesu, Heidi S. Harvie, Halina M. Zyczynski, Charles Rardin, Anthony Visco, Donna Mazloomdoost, Sonia Thomas, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • COVID-19 booster dose induces robust antibody response in pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant women
  • Caroline Atyeo, Lydia L. Shook, Nadege Nziza, Elizabeth A. Deriso, Cordelia Muir, Arantxa Medina Baez, Rosiane S. Lima, Stepan Demidkin, Sara Brigida, Rose M. De Guzman, Madeleine D. Burns, Alejandro B. Balazs, Alessio Fasano, Lael M. Yonker, Kathryn J. Gray, Galit Alter, Andrea G. Edlow

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.