Clinical impact of influenza vaccination after ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - insights from the IAMI trial - 08/12/22
, Matthias Götberg, MD b, David Erlinge, MD b, Zubair Akhtar, MPH c, e, Evald H. Christiansen, MD d, Chandini R. MacIntyre, MBBS, PhD e, Keith G. Oldroyd, MBChB, MD f, Zuzana Motovska, MD g, Andrejs Erglis, MD h, Rasmus Moer, MD i, Ota Hlinomaz, MD j, Lars Jakobsen, MD d, Thomas Engstrøm, MD k, Lisette O. Jensen, MD l, Christian O. Fallesen, MD l, Svend E Jensen, MD m, Oskar Angerås, MD n, Fredrik Calais, MD a, Amra Kåregren, MD o, Jörg Lauermann, MD p, Arash Mokhtari, MD b, Johan Nilsson, MD q, Jonas Persson, MD r, Per Stalby, MD s, Abu K.M.M. Islam, MD t, Afzalur Rahman, MD t, Fazila Malik, MBBS u, Sohel Choudhury, PhD u, Timothy Collier, MSc v, Stuart J. Pocock, PhD v, John Pernow, MD wRésumé |
Background |
Influenza vaccination early after myocardial infarction (MI) improves prognosis but vaccine effectiveness may differ dependent on type of MI.
Methods |
A total of 2,571 participants were prospectively enrolled in the Influenza vaccination after myocardial infarction (IAMI) trial and randomly assigned to receive in-hospital inactivated influenza vaccine or saline placebo. The trial was conducted at 30 centers in eight countries from October 1, 2016 to March 1, 2020. Here we report vaccine effectiveness in the 2,467 participants with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 1,348) or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI, n = 1,119). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, MI, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. Cumulative incidence of the primary and key secondary endpoints by randomized treatment and NSTEMI/STEMI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment effects were evaluated with formal interaction testing to assess for effect modification.
Results |
Baseline risk was higher in participants with NSTEMI. In the NSTEMI group the primary endpoint occurred in 6.5% of participants assigned to influenza vaccine and 10.5% assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), compared to 4.1% assigned to influenza vaccine and 4.5% assigned to placebo in the STEMI group (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.54-1.50, P = .237 for interaction). Similar findings were seen for the key secondary endpoints of all-cause death and cardiovascular death. The Kaplan-Meier risk difference in all-cause death at one year was more pronounced in participants with NSTEMI (NSTEMI: HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.80, STEMI: HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.70, interaction P = .028).
Conclusions |
The beneficial effect of influenza vaccination on adverse cardiovascular events may be enhanced in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 255
P. 82-89 - janvier 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- P2Y12 Inhibitors Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complex vs Non-Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
- Angelo Oliva, Domenico S. Castiello, Anna Franzone, Gianluigi Condorelli, Antonio Colombo, Giovanni Esposito, Giulio G. Stefanini, Raffaele Piccolo
- A comprehensive and easy-to-use ECG algorithm to predict the coronary occlusion site in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Carlo Gaspardone, Davide Romagnolo, Alessandro Fasolino, Giulio Falasconi, Alessandro Beneduce, Giorgio Fiore, Emma Didelon, Fabrizio Fortunato, Carmine Galdieri, Giuseppe Antonio Posteraro, Giacomo Ingallina, Francesco Ancona, Federico Biondi, Silvana Di Maio, Alice Casiraghi, Massimo Slavich, Giorgia Borio, Simone Savastano, Sergio Leonardi, Alberto Margonato, Eustachio Agricola, Michele Oppizzi, Achille Gaspardone, Carlo Pappone, Matteo Montorfano
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?