Helicopter versus ground ambulance transport for interfacility transfer of critically ill children - 18/10/22
, Christopher M. Horvat, MD, MHA a, b , Idris V. Evans, MD, MSc a, b , Bradley A. Kuch, MHA c , Jeremy M. Kahn, MD, MS a, d, ⁎ Abstract |
Background |
Following initial stabilization, critically ill children often require transfer to a specialized pediatric hospital. While the use of specialized pediatric transport teams has been associated with improved outcomes for these patients, the additional influence of transfer mode (helicopter or ground ambulance) on clinical outcomes remains unknown.
Methods |
We investigated the association between transport mode and outcomes among critically ill children transferred to a single pediatric hospital via a specialized pediatric transport team. We designed a retrospective cohort study to reduce indication bias by limiting analysis to patients for whom a helicopter transport was initially requested. We compared outcomes for those who ultimately traveled via helicopter, and for those who ultimately traveled via ground ambulance due to non-clinical factors.
Results |
We compared transport times, in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay by transport mode. Transport time in minutes was shorter for helicopter transports (median = 143, interquartile range [IQR]: 118–184) compared to ground ambulance transports (median = 289, IQR: 213–258; difference in medians = 146, 95% CI: 12 to 168, p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, helicopter transport was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality (helicopter = 6.0%, ground ambulance = 7.0%; 95% CI for difference: −6.6% to 3.3%; p = 0.64) but was associated with a statistically significant reduction in median hospital days (helicopter = 4, ground ambulance = 5; 95% CI -3 to 0; p = 0.04). In adjusted analyses, there were no statistically significant associations. These results were consistent across sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions |
Among critically ill pediatric patients without traumatic injuries transported by a specialty team, those patients who would have been transferred by helicopter if available but were instead transferred by ground ambulance reached their site of definitive care approximately 2.5 h later. Helicopter transport for these patients was not associated with in-hospital mortality, but was potentially associated with reduced hospital length of stay.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | For critically ill children, helicopter transport to definitive care is faster. |
• | While faster, helicopter transport is not associated with reduced mortality. |
• | Helicopter transport may be associated with reduced hospital length of stay. |
Keywords : Pediatrics, Critical care, Air ambulances, Outcomes, Emergency departments
Plan
Vol 61
P. 44-51 - novembre 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Association of diaphragm thickness and density measured on chest CT with disease severity in COVID-19 patients
- Selçuk Parlak, Muhammed Said Beşler, Muhammet Batuhan Gökhan
- Usefulness of sequential organ failure assessment score on admission to predict the 90-day mortality in patients with exertional heatstroke: An over 10-year intensive care survey
- Li Zhong, Ming Wu, Jingjing Ji, Zhifeng Liu
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?