S'abonner

Clinical prediction models in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study - 23/09/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106954 
Maria Cristina Vedovati a, , Greta Barbieri b, c, Chiara Urbini a, Erika D'Agostini a, d, Simone Vanni e, Chiara Papalini f, Giacomo Pucci g, Ludovica Anna Cimini a, Alessandro Valentino d, Lorenzo Ghiadoni h, c, Cecilia Becattini a
a Internal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine – Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy 
b Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Italy 
c Emergency Medicine Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Italy 
d Emergency Department, “M. Bufalini” Hospital, Cesena, Italy 
e Emergency Department, Empoli Hospital, Empoli, Italy 
f Infectious Diseases Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy 
g Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Unit of Internal Medicine, “Santa Maria” Terni University Hospital, Terni, Italy 
h Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy 

Corresponding author. Internal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine – Stroke Unit, Via G. Dottori, University of Perugia, Perugia, ItalyInternal, Vascular and Emergency Medicine – Stroke UnitUniversity of PerugiaVia G. DottoriPerugiaItaly

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Background

Clinical spectrum of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic infection to severe respiratory failure that may result in death. We aimed at validating and potentially improve existing clinical models to predict prognosis in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19.

Methods

Consecutive patients with acute confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized at 5 Italian non-intensive care unit centers during the 2020 outbreak were included in the study. Twelve validated prognostic scores for pneumonia and/or sepsis and specific COVID-19 scores were calculated for each study patient and their accuracy was compared in predicting in-hospital death at 30 days and the composite of death and orotracheal intubation.

Results

During hospital stay, 302 of 1044 included patients presented critical illness (28.9%), and 226 died (21.6%). Nine out of 34 items included in different prognostic scores were independent predictors of all-cause-death. The discrimination was acceptable for the majority of scores (APACHE II, COVID-GRAM, REMS, CURB-65, NEWS II, ROX-index, 4C, SOFA) to predict in-hospital death at 30 days and poor for the rest. A high negative predictive value was observed for REMS (100.0%) and 4C (98.7%) scores; the positive predictive value was poor overall, ROX-index having the best value (75.0%).

Conclusions

Despite the growing interest in prognostic models, their performance in patients with COVID-19 is modest. The 4C, REMS and ROX-index may have a role to select high and low risk patients at admission. However, simple predictors as age and PaO2/FiO2 ratio can also be useful as standalone predictors to inform decision making.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Predict prognosis in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 needs stratification.
12 prognostic scores were evaluated: the overall performance was modest.
Nine out of 34 evaluated items of prognostic scores were predictors of death.
Age and PaO2/FiO2 ratio can also be useful as standalone predictors of death.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Clinical decision rules, Mortality, SARS-CoV-2


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 202

Article 106954- octobre 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Does transbronchial lung cryobiopsy improve diagnostic yield of digital tomosynthesis-assisted electromagnetic navigation guided bronchoscopic biopsy of pulmonary nodules? A pilot study
  • Bryan S. Benn, Cameron G. Gmehlin, Jonathan S. Kurman, John Doan
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Clinical outcomes of digital health in adults with cystic fibrosis
  • Vincenzo Carnovale, Paola Iacotucci, Dandi Qiao, Lorenza Ferrillo, Jolanda Somma, Serena Buonaurio, Assunta Celardo, Daniela Savi

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.