S'abonner

Doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin with trabectedin followed by trabectedin alone as first-line therapy for metastatic or unresectable leiomyosarcoma (LMS-04): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial - 26/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00380-1 
Patricia Pautier, MD a, , Antoine Italiano, ProfMD d, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, MD e, Christine Chevreau, MD f, Nicolas Penel, ProfMD g, Nelly Firmin, MD h, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, MD i, François Bertucci, ProfMD j, Corinne Balleyguier, ProfMD b, Valérie Lebrun-Ly, MD k, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, ProfMD l, m, Elsa Kalbacher, MD n, Aurélie Bardet, MEng c, o, Emmanuelle Bompas, MD p, Olivier Collard, MD q, Nicolas Isambert, ProfMD r, Cécile Guillemet, MD s, Maria Rios, MD t, Baptiste Archambaud, MEng c, o, Florence Duffaud, ProfMD u
on behalf of the

French Sarcoma Group

Antoine ITALIANO, Patricia PAUTIER, Axel LECESNE, Sophie PIPERNO-NEUMANN, Christine CHEVREAU, Didier CUPISSOL, Nicolas PENEL, Jérôme ALEXANDRE, François BERTUCCI, Isabelle RAY-COQUARD, Valérie LEBRUN-LY, Elsa KALBACHER, Florence DUFFAUD, Corinne DELCAMBRE, Emmanuelle BOMPAS, Olivier COLLARD, Nicolas ISAMBERT, Cécile GUILLEMET, Patrick SOULIE, Maria RIOS, Esma SAADA-BOUZID

a Department of Medical Oncology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France 
b Department of Radiology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France 
c Bureau of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France 
d Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France 
e Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France 
f Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France 
g Lille University and Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France 
h Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France 
i Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France 
j Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France 
k Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France 
l Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France 
m University Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France 
n Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France 
o Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France 
p Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers-Nantes, France 
q Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France 
r Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François-Leclerc, Dijon, France 
s Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri-Becquerel, Rouen, France 
t Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France 
u Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France 

* Correspondence to: Dr Patricia Pautier, Department of Medical Oncology, University Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif 94805, France Department of Medical Oncology University Paris-Saclay Gustave-Roussy Villejuif 94805 France

Summary

Background

Metastatic leiomyosarcomas have a poor prognosis, and currently doxorubicin alone is used as the standard first-line treatment. Doxorubicin combined with trabectedin has shown promising results in phase 1 and 2 studies. We aimed to identify and compare the progression-free survival of patients with metastatic or unresectable uterine or soft tissue leiomyosarcoma treated with doxorubicin and trabectedin combined as first-line therapy versus doxorubicin alone in a phase 3 trial.

Methods

LMS-04 was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority phase 3 trial, which included patients from 20 centres of the French Sarcoma Group (anticancer centers or hospitals with an oncological unit) in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and had metastatic or relapsed unresectable leiomyosarcomas that had not previously been treated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by means of an interactive web response system (permuted blocks of different sizes from two to six), to receive either intravenous doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles or of intravenous doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus intravenous trabectedin (1·1 mg/m2) once every 3 weeks up to six cycles followed by maintenance with trabectedin alone. Surgery for residual disease was allowed in both groups after six cycles of treatment. Randomisation was stratified by tumour location (uterine vs soft tissue) and disease (locally advanced vs metastatic). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review and according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria. Efficacy analyses were performed on all randomly assigned patients, based on the intention-to-treat principle. The safety population included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one cycle of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02997358, and is closed to enrolment.

Findings

Between Jan 18, 2017, and March 21, 2019, 150 patients were enrolled (67 with uterine leiomyosarcomas and 83 with soft tissue leiomyosarcomas) and included in the intention-to-treat population: 76 in the doxorubicin alone group and 74 in the doxorubicin plus trabectedin group. The median duration of follow-up was 36·9 months (IQR 30·0–43·2) in the doxorubicine group and 38·8 months (32·7–44·2) in the doxorubicin plus trabectedin group. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with doxorubicin plus trabectedin versus doxorubicin alone (12·2 months [95% CI 10·1–15·6] vs 6·2 months [4·1–7·1]; adjusted hazard ratio 0·41 [95% CI 0·29–0·58]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (ten [13%] of 75 patients in the doxorubicin alone group vs 59 [80%] in the doxorubicin plus trabectedin group), anaemia (four [5%] vs 23 [31%]), thrombocytopenia (0 vs 35 [47%]), and febrile neutropenia (seven [9%] vs 21 [28%]). Nine (12%) patients in the doxorubicin alone group and 15 (201%) patients in the doxorubicin plus trabectedin group has serious adverse events. There was only one treatment-related death, reported in the doxorubicin alone group (cardiac failure).

Interpretation

Doxorubicin plus trabectedin in first-line therapy was found to significantly increase progression-free survival in patients with metastatic or unresectable leiomyosarcomas compared with doxorubicin alone, despite a higher but manageable toxicity, and could be considered an option for the first-line treatment of metastatic leiomyosarcomas.

Funding

PharmaMar.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 8

P. 1044-1054 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
  • Constantine S Tam, Jennifer R Brown, Brad S Kahl, Paolo Ghia, Krzysztof Giannopoulos, Wojciech Jurczak, Martin Šimkovič, Mazyar Shadman, Anders Österborg, Luca Laurenti, Patricia Walker, Stephen Opat, Henry Chan, Hanna Ciepluch, Richard Greil, Monica Tani, Marek Trněný, Danielle M Brander, Ian W Flinn, Sebastian Grosicki, Emma Verner, Alessandra Tedeschi, Jianyong Li, Tian Tian, Lei Zhou, Carol Marimpietri, Jason C Paik, Aileen Cohen, Jane Huang, Tadeusz Robak, Peter Hillmen
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Safety and efficacy of mosunetuzumab, a bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study
  • Lihua E Budde, Laurie H Sehn, Matthew Matasar, Stephen J Schuster, Sarit Assouline, Pratyush Giri, John Kuruvilla, Miguel Canales, Sascha Dietrich, Keith Fay, Matthew Ku, Loretta Nastoupil, Chan Yoon Cheah, Michael C Wei, Shen Yin, Chi-Chung Li, Huang Huang, Antonia Kwan, Elicia Penuel, Nancy L Bartlett

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.