S'abonner

Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential - 20/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013 
Sonal Grover, MD a, Adam D. Elwood, MD a, Jharna M. Patel, MD a, Cande V. Ananth, PhD, MPH b, c, d, e, Justin S. Brandt, MD f,
a Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 
b Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 
c Cardiovascular Institute of New Jersey and the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 
d Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 
e Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 
f Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 

Corresponding author: Justin S. Brandt, MD.

Abstract

Background

Whether research engagement on social media and other public platforms results in increased citations in obstetrics and gynecology remains uncertain. The Altmetric Attention Score is a metric of research influence based on mentions on social media and public platforms, such as newsfeeds and Wikipedia. The correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores, absolute citation rates, and the Relative Citation Ratio (a novel metric of research engagement also based on citation rates) in obstetrics and gynecology research is uncertain.

Objective

To evaluate the correlation between Altmetric Attention Score, absolute citation rate, and Relative Citation Ratio for articles published in obstetrics and gynecology journals from 2004 to 2019. Our second objective was to identify, characterize, and compare the 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios.

Study Design

We performed a cross-sectional altmetric and bibliometric study of all obstetrics and gynecology articles indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection from 2004 to 2019. Articles were included if they were published in obstetrics and gynecology journals according to InCites Journal Citation Reports indexing. Citation data, including citation numbers and Relative Citation Ratios, were downloaded on March 20, 2021 and merged with altmetric data from the Altmetric Explorer on the basis of each article’s unique PubMed identification number. We assessed correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and number of citations and Altmetric Attention Scores and Relative Citation Ratios by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. The 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were characterized and compared using means (standard deviations) and mean differences (95% confidence intervals).

Results

There were 156,592 articles published in 82 obstetrics and gynecology journals and indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection between 2004 and 2019. The correlation coefficient was 0.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.19) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs number of citations and 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.11) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs Relative Citation Ratios. There was no overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 most-cited list, and there was minimal overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 highest Relative Citation Ratio list (98 unique articles on each list). Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated substantially more engagement on social media and other public platforms than most-cited articles (mean Altmetric Attention Score, 763.1 [standard deviation, 520.8] vs 49.9 [standard deviation, 81.6]; mean difference, −713.2 [95% confidence interval, −819.9 to −606.6]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 116.2 [standard deviation, 415.9]; mean difference, −661.5 [95% confidence interval, −746.2 to −576.9]). In contrast, the articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated far fewer citations than most-cited articles (mean, 39.7 [standard deviation, 47.6] vs 541.8 [standard deviation, 312.8]; mean difference, 502.0 [95% confidence interval, 439.0–565.0]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 458.9 [standard deviation, 363.5]; mean difference, 427.7 [95% confidence interval, 353.8–501.6]). Nearly half of articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were basic/translational studies, often about menopause and environmental factors impacting fertility, whereas most-cited articles and articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were more likely to be reviews and consensus statements, respectively, often about placentation and polycystic ovary syndrome, respectively. Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were more likely to be published as open-access.

Conclusion

There seems to be weak short-term correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and citation rates. Further study is warranted to ascertain whether there may be long-term correlation between alternative metrics and citation rates in obstetrics and gynecology.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Altmetric Attention Score, bibliometrics, citation rates, Relative Citation Ratio, obstetrics and gynecology, journals


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 C.V.A. is supported, in part, by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant R01-HL150065) and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant R01-ES033190), National Institutes of Health.
 Cite this article as: Grover S, Elwood AD, Patel JM, et al. Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:300.e1-44.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 227 - N° 2

P. 300.e1-300.e44 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Cerebral biomarkers in neurologic complications of preeclampsia
  • Lina Bergman, Roxanne Hastie, Emma Bokström-Rees, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Sonja Schell, Henrik Imberg, Eduard Langenegger, Ashley Moodley, Susan Walker, Stephen Tong, Catherine Cluver
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Intrarectal diazepam following pelvic reconstructive surgery: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial
  • Emily R. Aldrich, Tiffanie Y. Tam, Leah M. Saylor, Catrina C. Crisp, Jennifer Yeung, Rachel N. Pauls

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.