S'abonner

Doppler velocimetry discordance between paired umbilical artery vessels and clinical implications in fetal growth restriction - 20/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.029 
Jon G. Steller, MD a, b, c, , Camille Driver, MA a, b, Diane Gumina, PhD a, b, Emma Peek, BS a, b, Teresa Harper, MD a, b, John C. Hobbins, MD a, b, Henry L. Galan, MD a, b
a University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 
b Colorado Fetal Care Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 
c Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 

Corresponding author: Jonathan G. Steller, MD.

Abstract

Background

Studies revealing a discrepancy in umbilical artery Dopplers between the two umbilical arteries in normally-grown fetuses necessitates further evaluation of the paired umbilical arteries in the setting of fetal growth restriction as this is a critical component in the surveillance of this population.

Objective

Umbilical artery Doppler sampling in fetal growth restriction is typically assessed in 1 umbilical artery in a free loop of cord. Although discrepancies of >20% between the 2 umbilical arteries occur in 1 of 3 normal pregnancies, this has not been assessed in fetal growth restriction. Our objectives were to determine the frequency of discordant Doppler pulsatility indices between paired umbilical arteries in a fetal growth restriction cohort and to determine if sampling of 1 or both arteries alters surveillance or timing of delivery.

Study Design

A cohort of 425 growth-restricted fetuses between 25 and 39 weeks of gestation had umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility indices determined from both umbilical arteries in a midsegment of the cord to determine: (1) the discrepancy percentage between paired umbilical artery pulsatility indices and (2) the frequency of both arteries being normal, abnormal, or discordant (pulsatility index < and >95th percentile). To determine what sampling method increased the detection of an abnormal Doppler index, 3 sampling methods were compared: (1) average pulsatility index from both umbilical arteries, (2) pulsatility index from 1 umbilical artery chosen randomly, and (3) highest pulsatility index of the 2 umbilical arteries.

Results

The mean percentage difference between umbilical artery pulsatility indices was 11.7%, and in 15.8% of cases, it exceeded 20%. Both umbilical artery pulsatility indices were normal in 71.1% (302/425), abnormal in 12.2% (52/425), and discordant in 16.7% (71/425) of cases (P<.0001). Of the 3 sampling methods, the pulsatility index was abnormal in: (1) 19.2% (82/425) of cases when averaged from both umbilical arteries, (2) 22.1% (94/425) of cases when choosing 1 umbilical artery at random, and (3) 28.9% (123/425) of cases when the highest umbilical artery pulsatility index was used (P=.003).

Conclusion

In this large fetal growth restriction cohort, the overall discrepancy between the 2 umbilical artery pulsatility indices was 11.7%. Among fetuses with at least 1 abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index, 71 of 123 (57.7%) had 1 normal pulsatility index and 1 abnormal. Thus, the number of arteries sampled and the sampling method used may alter clinical decision-making, including frequency of surveillance and timing of delivery.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Doppler velocimetry, fetal growth restriction, fetal surveillance, intrauterine growth restriction, umbilical artery


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 The Perelman Family Foundation provided financial support for this project but did not have any role in the study design, collection of data, analysis, interpretation, writing, or decision to submit.
 This study was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Grapevine, TX, February 3–8, 2020.
 Cite this article as: Steller JG, Driver C, Gumina D, et al. Doppler velocimetry discordance between paired umbilical artery vessels and clinical implications in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:285.e1-7.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 227 - N° 2

P. 285.e1-285.e7 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Brainstem and cerebellar volumes at magnetic resonance imaging are smaller in fetuses with congenital heart disease
  • Gregor O. Dovjak, Georg Hausmaninger, Tim Zalewski, Victor Schmidbauer, Michael Weber, Christof Worda, Elisabeth Seidl-Mlczoch, Vanessa Berger-Kulemann, Daniela Prayer, Gregor J. Kasprian, Barbara Ulm
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Chorioamnionitis and risk of long-term neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a population-based cohort study
  • Eleni Tsamantioti, Sarka Lisonkova, Giulia Muraca, Anne K. Örtqvist, Neda Razaz

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.