S'abonner

The impact of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial on the administration of antenatal corticosteroids - 20/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.037 
Elise O.R. Kearsey, BS (Hons) a, Jasper V. Been, MD, PhD b, c, Vivienne L. Souter, MD d, e, Sarah J. Stock, MD, PhD a, f,
a Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 
b Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands 
c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands 
d Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 
e Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle, WA 
f MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 

Corresponding author: Sarah J. Stock, MD, PhD.

Abstract

Background

In 2016 the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study was published, demonstrating that antenatal corticosteroid therapy given to women at risk of late preterm delivery reduces respiratory morbidity in infants. However, the administration of antenatal corticosteroid therapy in late-preterm infants remains controversial.

Late-preterm infants do not suffer from the same rates of morbidity as early-preterm infants, and the short-term benefits of antenatal corticosteroid therapy are less pronounced; consequently, the risk of possible harm is more difficult to balance.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study or the subsequent changes in guidelines and the rates of antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration in late-preterm infants in the United States.

Study Design

Data analyzed were publicly available US birth certificate data from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. An interrupted time series design was used to analyze the association between publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study and changes in monthly rates of antenatal corticosteroid administration in late preterm gestation (34+0 to 36+6 weeks). Births at 28+0 to 31+6 weeks’ gestation were used as a control. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration in women with births at 32+0 to 34+6 weeks was explored to analyze whether the intervention influenced antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration in women in the subgroup approaching 34 weeks’ gestation. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration in women with term births (>37 weeks’ gestation) was analyzed to explore if the intervention influenced the number of term babies exposed to antenatal corticosteroid therapy. Our regression model allowed analysis of both step and slope changes. February 2016 was chosen as the intervention period.

Results

Our sample size was 18,031,950 total births. Of these, 1,056,047 were births at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation, 123,788 at 28+0 to 31+6 weeks, 153,708 at 32 to 33 weeks, and 16,602,699 were term births. There were 95,708 births at <28 weeks’ gestation. There was a statistically significant increase in antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration rates in late preterm births following the online publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–1.61; P=.00). A significant increase in antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration rates was also seen in full-term births following the online publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study. No significant changes were seen in antenatal corticosteroid administration rates in gestational age groups of 32+0 to 33+6 weeks or 28+0 to 31+6 weeks.

Conclusion

Online publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study was associated with an immediate and sustained increase in the rates of antenatal corticosteroid therapy administration in late preterm births across the United States, demonstrating a swift and successful implementation of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study guidance into clinical practice. However, there is an unnecessary increase in full-term infants receiving antenatal corticosteroid therapy. Given that the long-term consequences of antenatal corticosteroid therapy are yet to be elucidated, efforts should be made to minimize the number of infants unnecessarily exposed to antenatal corticosteroid therapy.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : antenatal corticosteroids, late preterm birth, prematurity, steroids, time series analysis


Plan


 SJS is funded by a Welcome Trust clinical career development fellowship (209560/Z/17/Z).
 The other authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study did not receive any financial support.
 Cite this article as: Kearsey EOR, Been JV, Souter VL, et al. The impact of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial on the administration of antenatal corticosteroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:280.e1-15.


© 2022  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 227 - N° 2

P. 280.e1-280.e15 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Differences and similarities in endothelial and angiogenic profiles of preeclampsia and COVID-19 in pregnancy
  • Marta Palomo, Lina Youssef, Alex Ramos, Sergi Torramade-Moix, Ana Belen Moreno-Castaño, Julia Martinez-Sanchez, Laura Bonastre, Marc Pino, Pilar Gomez-Ramirez, Lidia Martin, Estefania Garcia Mateos, Pablo Sanchez, Sara Fernandez, Francesca Crovetto, Ginés Escolar, Enric Carreras, Pedro Castro, Eduard Gratacos, Fàtima Crispi, Maribel Diaz-Ricart
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Brainstem and cerebellar volumes at magnetic resonance imaging are smaller in fetuses with congenital heart disease
  • Gregor O. Dovjak, Georg Hausmaninger, Tim Zalewski, Victor Schmidbauer, Michael Weber, Christof Worda, Elisabeth Seidl-Mlczoch, Vanessa Berger-Kulemann, Daniela Prayer, Gregor J. Kasprian, Barbara Ulm

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.