S'abonner

More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer - 20/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.004 
David A. Barrington, MD a, Jennifer A. Sinnott, PhD b, Danaye Nixon, MS b, Tasleem J. Padamsee, PhD c, David E. Cohn, MD, MBA a, Kemi M. Doll, MD d, Macarius M. Donneyong, PhD c, e, Ashley S. Felix, PhD f,
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 
b Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 
c Division of Health Services, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 
d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 
e Division of Outcomes and Translational Sciences, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 
f Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 

Corresponding author: Ashley S. Felix, PhD.

Abstract

Background

Disparities in adjuvant treatment between Black and White women with endometrial cancer exist and contribute to worse outcomes among Black women. However, factors leading to disparate treatment receipt are understudied.

Objective

We examined whether patient refusal of adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy or radiation) differed between Black and White women and whether treatment refusal mediated racial disparities in survival among women with endometrial cancer.

Study Design

We used the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based cancer registry, to identify non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2016 who either received or refused recommended radiation or chemotherapy. We used logistic regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for associations between race and treatment refusal. We also examined predictors of treatment refusal in race-specific models. Accelerated failure time models were used to estimate absolute differences in overall survival by race. We used causal mediation analysis to estimate the proportion of racial differences in overall survival attributable to racial differences in adjuvant treatment refusal. We considered the overall study population and strata defined by histology, and adjusted for sociodemographic, tumor, and facility characteristics.

Results

Our analysis included 75,447 endometrial cancer patients recommended to receive radiation and 60,187 endometrial cancer patients recommended to receive chemotherapy, among which 6.4% and 11.4% refused treatment, respectively. Among Black women recommended for radiation or chemotherapy, 6.4% and 9.6% refused, respectively. Among White women recommended for radiation or chemotherapy, 6.4% and 11.8% refused, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, facility characteristics, and tumor characteristics, Black women were more likely to refuse chemotherapy than White women (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.37), but no difference in radiation refusal was observed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.11). Some predictors of radiation refusal varied by race, namely income, education, histology, stage, and chemotherapy receipt (P interactions<.05), whereas predictors of chemotherapy refusal were generally similar between Black and White women. Among women recommended for radiation, Black women survived an average of 4.3 years shorter than White women, which did not seem attributable to differences in radiation refusal. Among women recommended for chemotherapy, Black women survived an average of 3.2 years shorter than White women of which 1.9 months (4.9%) could potentially be attributed to differences in chemotherapy refusal.

Conclusion

We observed differences in chemotherapy refusal by race, and those differences may be responsible for up to about 2 months of the overall 3.2-year survival disparity between White and Black women. Radiation refusal did not explain any of the 4.3-year disparity among women recommended for radiation. Treatment refusal accounts for, at most, a small fraction of the total racial disparity in endometrial cancer survival. Although a better understanding of the reasons for patient treatment refusal and subsequent intervention may help improve outcomes for some women, other causes of disparate outcomes, particularly those reflecting the social determinants of health, must be investigated.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : chemotherapy, disparities, hospital-based cancer registry, race, radiation treatment, uterus neoplasm


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute, United States (K01CA21845701A1 to A.S.F.).
 Cite this article as: Barrington DA, Sinnott JA, Nixon D, et al. More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:244.e1-17.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 227 - N° 2

P. 244.e1-244.e17 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Integration of health systems science and women’s healthcare
  • Christopher M. Morosky, Susan M. Cox, LaTasha B. Craig, Elise N. Everett, David A. Forstein, Scott C. Graziano, Brittany S. Hampton, Laura Hopkins, Shireen Madani Sims, Margaret L. Mckenzie, Celeste Royce, Helen Kang Morgan, Undergraduate Medical Education Committee (Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics)
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Women’s and men’s intake of omega-3 fatty acids and their food sources and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
  • Albert Salas-Huetos, Mariel Arvizu, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Makiko Mitsunami, Jordi Ribas-Maynou, Marc Yeste, Jennifer B. Ford, Irene Souter, Jorge E. Chavarro, EARTH Study Team

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.