S'abonner

Integration of health systems science and women’s healthcare - 20/07/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.038 
Christopher M. Morosky, MD, MS a, , Susan M. Cox, MD b, LaTasha B. Craig, MD c, Elise N. Everett, MD d, David A. Forstein, DO e, Scott C. Graziano, MD f, Brittany S. Hampton, MD g, Laura Hopkins, MD h, Shireen Madani Sims, MD i, Margaret L. Mckenzie, MD j, Celeste Royce, MD k, l, Helen Kang Morgan, MD m
On behalf of the

Undergraduate Medical Education Committee (Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics)

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 
b Department of Medical Education, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 
c Section of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 
d Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Services, The Robert Larner, MD College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 
e Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO 
f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 
g Divisions of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI 
h Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada 
i Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 
j Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic South Pointe Hospital, Cleveland, OH 
k Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 
l Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 
m Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 

Corresponding author: Christopher M. Morosky, MD, MS.

Abstract

Health systems science addresses the complex interactions in healthcare delivery. At its core, health systems science describes the intricate details required to provide high-quality care to individual patients by assisting them in navigating the multifaceted and often complicated US healthcare delivery system. With advances in technology, informatics, and communication, the modern physician is required to have a strong working knowledge of health systems science to provide effective, low-cost, high-quality care to patients. Medical educators are poised to introduce health systems science concepts alongside the basic science and clinical science courses already being taught in medical school. Because of the common overlap of women’s healthcare subject matter with health systems science topics, such as interprofessional collaboration, ethics, advocacy, and quality improvement, women’s health medical educators are at the forefront of incorporating health systems science into the current medical school educational model. Here, the authors have described the concept of health systems science and discussed both why and how it should be integrated into the undergraduate medical education curriculum. Medical educators must develop physicians of the future who can not only provide excellent patient care but also actively participate in the advancement and improvement of the healthcare delivery system.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : basic science, clinical science, healthcare delivery, healthcare systems, health systems science, interprofessional education, medical ethics, patient advocacy, quality improvement, undergraduate medical education, women’s health medical education


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 227 - N° 2

P. 236-243 - août 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Accurate identification of cohort study designs in perinatal research: a practical guide
  • Jonathan M. Snowden, Mark A. Klebanoff
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer
  • David A. Barrington, Jennifer A. Sinnott, Danaye Nixon, Tasleem J. Padamsee, David E. Cohn, Kemi M. Doll, Macarius M. Donneyong, Ashley S. Felix

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.