S'abonner

The impact of patient age on practice patterns and outcomes for primary hyperparathyroidism - 20/06/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.03.007 
Whitney Sutton a, Joseph K. Canner a, Jessica B. Shank b, Abbey L. Fingeret b, Shkala Karzai a, Dorry L. Segev a, Jason D. Prescott a, Aarti Mathur a,
a Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA 
b Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA 

Corresponding author. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 606, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine600 North Wolfe StreetBlalock 606BaltimoreMD21287USA

Abstract

Background

Management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in older patients (age >50) is controversial. The 4th International Workshop on the Management of Asymptomatic PHPT recommends surveillance for older patients who lack objective signs of disease, whereas The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) guidelines recommend consideration of parathyroidectomy for patients of any age with subjective constitutional, neuropsychiatric, or cognitive symptoms. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between patient age and both practice patterns and outcomes in the management of patients with sporadic PHPT.

Methods

The Collaborative Endocrine Surgery Quality Improvement Program (CESQIP) database was queried for all adults (age ≥18) who underwent an index parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism between 2014 and 2020. Associations between patient age (≤50 years vs. >50 years) and both practice patterns and outcomes were evaluated separately using adjusted multivariable logistic and multinomial regression models.

Results

Of 9,938 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, 8,080 (81.3%) were >50 years old and 1,858 (18.7%) were ≤50. Of this cohort, 17% of older patients and 26% of younger patients presented with only subjective symptoms. Compared to younger patients, older patients were more likely to have an objective indication for parathyroidectomy (aOR = 1.8, 95%CI: 1.6–2.0, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to undergo ≥2 imaging studies pre-operatively (aOR = 1.2, 95%CI: 1.1–1.3, p = 0.003), to undergo bilateral neck exploration (aOR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.3–1.6, p < 0.001), and to have multi-gland disease (aOR = 1.6, 95%CI: 1.4–1.8, p < 0.001). There was no difference between age groups and parathyroidectomy-related complications including hypocalcemia, vocal cord dysfunction, hematoma requiring evacuation, or reintubation, however, older patients were less likely to have any peri-operative morbidity (aOR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.6–0.9, p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Older patients were more likely to meet objective criteria prior to undergoing parathyroidectomy by CESQIP participating high-volume endocrine surgeons, however they were less likely to have peri-operative complications compared to younger patients. Given the growing evidence demonstrating improvement of both objective and subjective symptoms after parathyroidectomy for PHPT, additional studies are still needed to fully understand the benefit of surgical referral in older adults for less objective indications.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism in patients age >50 is controversial.
Age >50 more frequently underwent bilateral neck exploration and had multigland disease.
There was no difference between age groups and parathyroidectomy-related complications.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 224 - N° 1PB

P. 400-407 - juillet 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Teaching primary palliative care to general surgical residents: A novel pedagogical approach drawn from multi-disciplinary focus group data
  • Kristen Schultz, Shannon Howard, Kirstin Moreno, Timothy Siegel, David Zonies, Karen Brasel, Mackenzie Cook
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Ethanol ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules
  • Gabrielle K. Steinl, Latoya A. Stewart, Catherine McManus, James A. Lee, Jennifer H. Kuo

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.