S'abonner

Opioid Use After Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Study - 13/06/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.002 
D.C. Cheung 1, L.J. Martin 2, N.K. Jivraj 3, H. Clarke 4, 5, T. Gomes 6, 7, D.N. Wijeysundera 5, 7, 8, C. Diong 7, M. Nayan 1, O. Saarela 9, S.M.H. Alibhai 10, M. Komisarenko 2, N.E. Fleshner 1, 2, G.S. Kulkarni 1, 2, A. Finelli 1, 2,
1 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
2 Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada 
3 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
4 Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada 
5 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
6 Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada 
7 ICES, Toronto, Canada 
8 Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada 
9 Biostatistics Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 
10 Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada 

Address correspondence to: Antonio Finelli, MD, MSc, FRCSC, University Health Network, 6th Floor, 700 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1Z5.University Health Network6th Floor, 700 University AveTorontoONM5G 1Z5Canada

Abstract

Objective

To compare the odds of early and prolonged post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open surgery for nephrectomy.

Methods

For opioid-naïve patients in Ontario who underwent nephrectomy for kidney cancer (1994-2017, n = 7900), post-discharge opioid use was determined by prescriptions in the Ontario Drug Benefit database (age ≥65 years) and the Narcotics Monitoring System (all patients from 2012). Early opioid use was defined as ≥1 prescription 1-90 days after surgery. Two separate definitions of prolonged opioid use were examined: (1) prescription(s) for ≥60 days during post-operative days 90-365; (2) ≥1 prescriptions between both of: 1-90 days AND 91-180 days after surgery. Predictors of opioid use were assessed using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression, accounting for surgeon clustering.

Results

Overall, 67.4% of patients received early opioid prescriptions; however, prolonged use was low, ranging from 1.6 to 4.4% of patients depending on the definition. In multivariable analysis, open nephrectomy was associated with higher odds of early opioid use compared to MIS nephrectomy (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.19-1.55). Surgery type was not significantly associated with prolonged opioid use for either definition (OR 1.22, CI 0.79-1.89 and OR 1.06, CI 0.83-1.35).

Conclusions

In this population-level study of patients undergoing nephrectomy for kidney cancer, patients who received open surgery were at increased odds of receiving early post-operative opioids compared to MIS. Prolonged opioid use was low overall and was not significantly with associated with type of surgery.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Financial Disclosure: Dr. Gomes has received grant funds from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). All other authors have nothing to disclose.
 Financial Support: This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by MOHLTC, Cancer Care Ontario, and the Canadian Institute for Health Information. We thank IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. for use of their Drug Information Database. This study also received funding from the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation. Dr. Gomes is supported by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair. The analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred.


© 2022  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 164

P. 118-123 - juin 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • AUTHOR REPLY
  • James Nie, Benjamin N. Breyer, Michael S. Leapman
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Predictors and Cost Comparison of Subsequent Urinary Stone Care at Index Versus Non-Index Hospitals
  • William W. French, Charles D. Scales, Davis P. Viprakasit, Roger L. Sur, David F. Friedlander

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.