S'abonner

Patterns of opioid prescribing in emergency departments during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic - 14/05/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.040 
Tucker Lurie, MD a, , Naomi Bonnin, BS b, Jeffrey Rea, MD c, d, e , Gurshawn Tuteja, BS f , Zachary Dezman, MD, MS, MS c, d , R. Gentry Wilkerson, MD c, d , Adelina Buganu, MD c, d, Rose Chasm, MD c, d , Daniel J. Haase, MD c, d, e , Quincy K. Tran, MD, PhD c, d, e, g
a Wellspan York Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, 1001 South George Street, York, PA, 17403, USA 
b University of Maryland Global Campus, 1616 McCormick Dr, Largo, MD 20774, USA 
c University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
e Program in Trauma, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 
f Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912, USA 
g The Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine & Critical Care, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, suite P1G01, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA 

Corresponding author at: 1001 South George Street, York, PA 17403, USA.1001 South George StreetYorkPA17403USA

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic was superimposed upon an ongoing epidemic of opioid use disorder and overdose deaths. Although the trend of opioid prescription patterns (OPP) had decreased in response to public health efforts before the pandemic, little is known about the OPP from emergency department (ED) clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a pre-post study of adult patients who were discharged from 13 EDs and one urgent care within our academic medical system between 01/01/2019 and 09/30/2020 using an interrupted time series (ITS) approach. Patient characteristics and prescription data were extracted from the single unified electronic medical record across all study sites. Prescriptions of opioids were converted into morphine equivalent dose (MED). We compared the “Covid-19 Pandemic” period (C19, 03/29/2020–9/30/2020) and the “Pre-Pandemic” period (PP, 1/19/202003/28/2020). We used a multivariate logistic regression to assess clinical factors associated with opioid prescriptions.

Results

We analyzed 361,794 ED visits by adult patients, including 259,242 (72%) PP and 102,552 (28%) C19 visits. Demographic information and percentages of patients receiving opioid prescriptions were similar in both groups. The median [IQR] MED per prescription was higher for C19 patients (70 [56–90]) than for PP patients (60 [60–90], P < 0.001). ITS demonstrated a significant trend toward higher MED prescription per ED visit during the pandemic (coefficient 0.11, 95% CI 0.05–0.16, P = 0.002). A few factors, that were associated with lower likelihood of opioid prescriptions before the pandemic, became non-significant during the pandemic.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that emergency clinicians increased the prescribed amount of opioids per prescription during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Etiologies for this finding could include lack of access to primary care and other specialties during the pandemic, or lower volumes allowing for emergency clinicians to identify who is safe to be prescribed opioids.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Opioid prescriptions, COVID-19 pandemic, Interrupted time series

Abbreviations : COVID-19, ED, CDC, PDMP, HOPE, OUD, UMMS, EHR, SQL, ESI, ICD-10, MED, IQR, ITS, VIF, AUROC


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 56

P. 63-70 - juin 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Validation of a simplified comorbidity evaluation predicting clinical outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 – A multicenter retrospective observation study
  • James P. d'Etienne, Naomi Alanis, Eric Chou, John S. Garrett, Jessica J. Kirby, David P. Bryant, Sajid Shaikh, Chet D. Schrader, Hao Wang
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Utility of non-invasive synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Bora Cekmen, Busra Bildik, Oner Bozan, Seref Emre Atis, Serkan Dogan, Abdullah Osman Kocak

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.