S'abonner

Observation versus screening spinal MRI and pre-emptive treatment for spinal cord compression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastases in the UK (PROMPTS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial - 29/03/22

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00092-4 
David Dearnaley, ProfFRCR a, c, Victoria Hinder, BSc b, Adham Hijab, MD c, Gail Horan, FRCR d, Narayanan Srihari, FRCR e, Philip Rich, FRCR f, J Graeme Houston, ProfMD g, Ann M Henry, MD h, Stephanie Gibbs, FRCR i, Ram Venkitaraman, FRCR j, Clare Cruickshank, BSc b, Shama Hassan, MSc b, Alec Miners, PhD k, Malcolm Mason, ProfMD l, Ian Pedley, FRCR m, Heather Payne, ProfFRCR n, Susannah Brock, FRCR o, Robert Wade, FRCR p, Angus Robinson, FRCR q, Omar Din, FRCR r, Kathryn Lees, FRCR s, John Graham, FRCR t, Jane Worlding, FRCR u, Julia Murray, FRCR a, c, Chris Parker, MD a, c, Clare Griffin, MSc b, Aslam Sohaib, FRCR c, , Emma Hall, ProfPhD b, ,
on behalf of the

PROMPTS investigators

a Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK 
b Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK 
c Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
d Clinical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King’s Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King’s Lynn, UK 
e Clinical Oncology, The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK 
f Radiology, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
g Imaging Science and Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK 
h Clinical Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 
i Clinical Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK 
j Clinical Oncology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK 
k Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK 
l Clinical Oncology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 
m Clinical Oncology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK 
n Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 
o Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK 
p Clinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK 
q Clinical Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK 
r Clinical Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK 
s Clinical Oncology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK 
t Clinical Oncology, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK 
u Oncology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK 

* Correspondence to: Prof Emma Hall, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit The Institute of Cancer Research London SM2 5NG UK

Summary

Background

Early diagnosis of malignant spinal cord compression (SCC) is crucial because pretreatment neurological status is the major determinant of outcome. In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, SCC is a clinically significant cause of disease-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether screening for SCC with spinal MRI, and pre-emptive treatment if radiological SCC (rSCC) was detected, reduced the incidence of clinical SCC (cSCC) in asymptomatic patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and spinal metastasis.

Methods

We did a parallel-group, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were recruited from 45 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, with an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, asymptomatic spinal metastasis, no previous SCC, and no spinal MRI in the past 12 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation algorithm with a random element (balancing factors were treatment centre, alkaline phosphatase [normal vs raised, with the upper limit of normal being defined at each participating laboratory], number of previous systemic treatments [first-line vs second-line or later], previous spinal treatment, and imaging of thorax and abdomen), to no MRI (control group) or screening spinal MRI (intervention group). Serious adverse events were monitored in the 24 h after screening MRI in the intervention group. Participants with screen-detected rSCC were offered pre-emptive treatment (radiotherapy or surgical decompression was recommended per treating physician’s recommendation) and 6-monthly spinal MRI. All patients were followed up every 3 months, and then at month 30 and 36. The primary endpoint was time to and incidence of confirmed cSCC in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all patients randomly assigned), with the primary timepoint of interest being 1 year after randomisation. The study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN74112318, and is now complete.

Findings

Between Feb 26, 2013, and April 25, 2017, 420 patients were randomly assigned to the control (n=210) or screening MRI (n=210) groups. Median age was 74 years (IQR 68 to 79), 222 (53%) of 420 patients had normal alkaline phosphatase, and median prostate-specific antigen concentration was 48 ng/mL (IQR 17 to 162). Screening MRI detected rSCC in 61 (31%) of 200 patients with assessable scans in the intervention group. As of data cutoff (April 23, 2020), at a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 13 to 31), time to cSCC was not significantly improved with screening (hazard ratio 0·64 [95% CI 0·37 to 1·11]; Gray’s test p=0·12). 1-year cSCC rates were 6·7% (95% CI 3·8–10·6; 14 of 210 patients) for the control group and 4·3% (2·1–7·7; nine of 210 patients) for the intervention group (difference −2·4% [95% CI −4·2 to 0·1]). Median time to cSCC was not reached in either group. No serious adverse events were reported within 24 h of screening.

Interpretation

Despite the substantial incidence of rSCC detected in the intervention group, the rate of cSCC in both groups was low at a median of 22 months of follow-up. Routine use of screening MRI and pre-emptive treatment to prevent cSCC is not warranted in patients with asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with spinal metastasis.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2022  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 4

P. 501-513 - avril 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in classic or endemic Kaposi’s sarcoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study
  • Julie Delyon, Lucie Biard, Marion Renaud, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, Jérôme Le Goff, Stéphane Dalle, Valentine Heidelberger, Laetitia Da Meda, Laurie Toullec, Guislaine Carcelain, Samia Mourah, Sophie Caillat-Zucman, Vincent Allain, Maxime Battistella, Céleste Lebbe
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Price changes and within-class competition of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a comparative analysis
  • Kerstin N Vokinger, Thomas J Hwang, David L Carl, Yannic Laube, Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Huseyin Naci, Aaron S Kesselheim

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.