S'abonner

Emergency department diagnosis and management of constipation in the United States, 2006–2017 - 16/03/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.065 
Amy Z. Zhou, MD, PhD a, , Douglas Lorenz, PhD b, Norma-Jean Simon, MPH, MPA c, Todd A. Florin, MD, MSCE c
a Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America 
b School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States of America 
c Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America.Division of Pediatric Emergency MedicineDepartment of PediatricsUT Southwestern Medical Center5323 Harry Hines BlvdDallasTX75390United States of America

Abstract

Background

Constipation is a common diagnosis in adults and children. Emergency department (ED) visits for constipation increased from 1980 to 2010. Since then, efforts have aimed to reduce resource utilization for constipation in the ED setting. Our objective is to examine contemporary ED practice patterns in the context of updated care guidelines.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2006 to 2017. Encounters with a constipation diagnosis were included. We examined rates of ED visits, diagnostic testing, and medication use. We also compared general and pediatric ED practice patterns for children.

Results

Approximately 1.3 million ED visits with a diagnosis of constipation occurred annually, with pediatric encounters comprising one-third of all visits. There was a 114% increase in ED visits for constipation over the study period. Urinalysis and imaging increased by 17% and 15%, respectively. Older patients were more likely to undergo diagnostic testing. No significant changes in laboratory testing, radiographs, or osmotic laxative prescriptions were observed among children. Compared to pediatric EDs, general EDs were more likely to perform CBC (29% vs. 15%) and urinalysis testing (42% vs 31%). General EDs were less likely to prescribe osmotic laxatives for children compared to pediatric EDs (26% vs. 37%).

Conclusion

ED visits for constipation have increased significantly since 2006. Rates of diagnostic tests and prescriptions have not changed despite published evidence and guidelines that the diagnosis of constipation does not require imaging, and that the management of constipation requires consistent outpatient treatment. Opportunities exist to reduce ED resource utilization through knowledge dissemination and implementation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Constipation is a common complaint that is most often addressed in the outpatient setting.
Emergency department (ED) constipation visits increased in the early 2000s, but current trends are unknown.
Successful local efforts have decreased ED use and diagnostic testing for constipation.
We found that constipation visits continued to increase significantly from 2006 to 2017.
The use of diagnostic tests and treatments have not changed significantly over time.
General EDs are more likely than pediatric EDs to perform diagnostic tests and less likely to prescribe osmotic laxatives.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Constipation, Emergency department, Diagnostic testing, Resource utilization


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 54

P. 91-96 - avril 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • SARS COV-2 anti-nucleocapsid and anti-spike antibodies in an emergency department healthcare worker cohort: September 2020 – April 2021
  • Ralph C. Wang, Charles E. Murphy, Aaron E. Kornblith, Nicole A. Hohenstein, Cornelius M. Carter, Angela H.K. Wong, Theodore Kurtz, Michael A. Kohn
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Vaccination status among patients with the need for emergency hospitalizations related to COVID-19
  • İbrahim Toker, Ayşin Kılınç Toker, Ayşe Turunç Özdemir, İlhami Çelik, Oğuzhan Bol, Emre Bülbül

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.