S'abonner

Performance comparison of intraosseous devices and setups for infusion of whole blood in a cadaveric swine bone model - 16/03/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.039 
Katherine J. Lee, DO a, Morgan M. McGuire, MD a, f, Warren C. Harvey, MD a, William D. Bianchi, DO a, b, f, Alec D. Emerling, MD a, Erin R. Reilly, MPH a, Vikhyat S. Bebarta, MD d, e, Jason J. Lopez, MD a, Gregory J. Zarow, PhD b, c, Jonathan D. Auten, DO a, b, f,
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America 
b Naval Medical Center San Diego, Combat Trauma Research Group, Clinical Investigation Department, San Diego, CA, United States of America 
c The Emergency Statistician, Idyllwild, CA, United States of America 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America 
e Center for COMBAT Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America 
f Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, 34,800 Bob Wilson Drive, San Diego, CA 92134.Department of Emergency MedicineNaval Medical Center San Diego34,800 Bob Wilson DriveSan DiegoCA92134

Abstract

Objectives

Intraosseous (IO) access can provide a critical bridge for blood product infusion when peripheral venous access is not obtainable. Successful pressurized IO infusion requires flow rates sufficient to preserve life, but with infusion pressures low enough to avoid clinical complications (e.g., hemolysis, bone damage, fat emboli). However, the optimal method for pressured IO delivery of blood was unknown.

Methods

Three trained physicians infused 500 mL of whole blood through a 15-gauge, 45 mm IO catheter into fresh, high bone density cadaveric swine proximal humeri. Participants applied eight different pressure infusion strategies: (1) gravity, (2) pressure bag, (3) pressure bag actively maintained at or above 300 mmHg, (4) hand pump, (5) hand pump with pressure bag, (6) push-pull with 10 mL syringe, (7) push-pull with 60 mL syringe, and a (8) Manual Rapid Infuser in a randomized within-subjects design (30 trials per method, 240 trials total). The primary outcomes of flow rates, mean and peak pressures, and user ratings were contrasted using ANOVA at p < 0.05.

Results

The Manual Rapid Infuser conferred the highest flow rates (199 ± 3 mL/min) and most favorable user ratings, but also the highest mean and peak pressures. Push-pull conferred the next highest flow rates (67 ± 5 mL/min for 60 mL, 56 ± 2 mL/min for 10 mL) and pressures, with intermediate-to-high user ratings. Hand pump flow rates were essentially identical with (45 ± 4 mL/min) or without (44 ± 3 mL/min) pressure bag, with high user ratings without a pressure bag. Pressure bag and gravity methods conferred low flow rates and user ratings.

Conclusions

Some pressured IO infusion methods can achieve flow rates adequate to serve as a resuscitative bridge in the massively hemorrhaged trauma victim, but flow rates and pressures vary greatly across IO pressurized infusion methods. Manual Rapid Infuser and push-pull methods conferred high flow rates but also relatively high pressures, highlighting the importance of using in vivo models in future research to assess the possible clinical complications of using these promising methods. Combined, present findings highlight the importance of studying pressurized IO methods towards preserving the life of the critically injured trauma victim.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Blood transfusion, Hemorrhagic shock, Intraosseous infusion, IO access, Trauma


Plan


© 2022  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 54

P. 58-64 - avril 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Injuries from nonmotorized scooters treated in emergency departments in the United States, 2005–2020
  • Peter Tuckel
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Effects of resuscitation guideline terminology on pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Hyeonseok Noh, Wongyu Lee, Dongjun Yang, Je Hyeok Oh

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.