S'abonner

Reduced mortality and faster treatment in sepsis seen at freestanding vs. hospital-based emergency departments - 16/03/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.005 
Gregory Griffin, DO a, Courtney M. Smalley, MD c, d, Baruch S. Fertel, MD c, d, Kevin Mo, BS a, Jessica Krizo, PhD b, Caroline Mangira, RN, MPH b, c, Erin Simon, DO a,
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General Akron, OH, United States of America 
b Department of Research, Cleveland Clinic Akron General Akron, OH, United States of America 
c Emergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic Health System Cleveland, OH, United States of America 
d Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Introduction

Freestanding Emergency Departments (FEDs) have grown in number and understanding their impact on the healthcare system is important. Sepsis causes significant morbidity and mortality and identifying how FEDs impact sepsis morbidity and mortality has not been studied. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in in-hospital mortality for sepsis patients who present initially to FEDs compared to a hospital-based ED.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort of adult patients seen at a hospital-based ED or one of three FEDs within a large hospital system from 1/1/2018–10/31/2020. We included those who were diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock and evaluated ED throughput measures, in-hospital mortality, and hospital length of stay. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviations or median and quartiles depending on distribution. Multiple logistic regression was fit to compare in-hospital mortality rates between the two groups. Variables controlled for included Charlson Comorbidity Index, race, gender, insurance, and sepsis severity. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the time metrics.

Results

There were 1955 patients included in the study. Mean age of participants was 61.9 at the FEDs vs 63.7 at the HBED. Majority of the participants were white; 88.2% at the FED vs. 77.3% at the HBED; and male 49.0% at the FED vs. 51.1% at the HBED. Most patients had Medicare; 45.4% at the FED vs. 58.3% at the HBED. In-patient mortality rate was significantly lower for patients that presented to FEDs compared to HBED (95%CI 0.13–0.46) adjusted odds ratio 0.24. Time to IV fluids, time to lactate, time to blood cultures, time to ED disposition, ED LOS, time to arrival on the inpatient unit were all significantly lower for FEDs vs HBED (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients presenting to FEDs for sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock had lower inpatient mortality, quicker treatment times, and were transferred and admitted to the hospital faster than patients seen at a HBED.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Emergency department, Freestanding, Mortality, Sepsis


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 54

P. 249-252 - avril 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Temporal associations between emergency department and telehealth volumes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A time-series analysis from 2 academic medical centers
  • Elaine M. Reno, Benjamin H. Li, Morgan Eutermoser, Christopher B. Davis, Jason S. Haukoos, Bradley D. Shy
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Higher frequency of new chest tumor diagnoses in emergency department due to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Klaudia Krzyzaniak, Mariusz Sieminski

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.