S'abonner

Avoidable emergency department visits for rabies vaccination - 16/03/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.007 
Tomona Iso, PharmD a, b, Fangzheng Yuan, PharmD a, b, Elsie Rizk, PharmD a, b, Anh Thu Tran, PharmD a, b, R. Benjamin Saldana, DO c, Prasanth R. Boyareddigari, MD c, Ngoc-anh A. Nguyen, MD c, Daniela Espino, PharmD a, Julia S. Benoit, PhD d, e, Joshua T. Swan, PharmD, MPH a, b, f,
a Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA 
b Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA 
c Emergency Department, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA 
d Department of Basic Science, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA 
e Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA 
f Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA 

Corresponding author at: Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin St, SM1661, Houston, TX 77030, USA.Department of SurgeryHouston Methodist Hospital6550 Fannin St, SM1661HoustonTX77030USA

Abstract

Background

Administering subsequent doses of rabies vaccine is not a medical emergency and does not require access to emergency department (ED) services. This study reviewed ED visits for rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to identify avoidable ED visits for subsequent rabies vaccination.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who received human rabies immune globulin (HRIG) or rabies vaccine at 15 EDs of a multi-hospital health system from 2016 to 2018. All ED visits were classified as initial or non-initial healthcare visits after animal exposure. Emergency department visits for non-initial healthcare were classified as necessary (HRIG administration, worsening symptoms, other emergent conditions, or vaccination during a natural disaster) or avoidable (rabies vaccination only).

Results

This study included 145 patients with 203 ED visits (113 initial and 90 non-initial healthcare visits). Avoidable ED visits were identified for 19% (28 of 145) of patients and 66% (59 of 90) of ED visits for non-initial healthcare. Contributing factors for avoidable ED visits were suboptimal ED discharge instructions to return to the ED for vaccination (n = 20 visits) and patients' inability to coordinate outpatient follow-up (n = 17 visits). Patients with previous avoidable ED visits had a 73% probability for unnecessarily returning to the ED for vaccination. The average number of avoidable ED visits observed per patient was 0.41 (95% CI = 0.25 to 0.56). Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that 30,000 to 60,000 Americans initiates rabies PEP each year, we estimate that 7500 to 33,600 avoidable ED visits occur for rabies vaccination in the US each year.

Conclusions

One of 5 patients who received rabies PEP in the ED had avoidable ED visits for subsequent rabies vaccination. This study highlights systemic lack of coordination following ED discharge and barriers to accessing rabies vaccine.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Administering subsequent rabies vaccine does not require emergency services.
19% of patients returned to the ED for subsequent doses of rabies vaccine only.
These ED visits were avoidable as vaccine could be given in a non-ED setting.
Limited access to vaccine in non-ED settings contributed to avoidable ED visits.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Rabies postexposure prophylaxis, Rabies vaccine, Emergency department, Healthcare resource utilization, Healthcare delivery

Abbreviations : CI, ED, EHR, ESI, HRIG, PEP, SD


Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 54

P. 242-248 - avril 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Prevalence and significance of incidental findings on computed tomography pulmonary angiograms: A retrospective cohort study
  • Ali Eskandari, Sabarish Narayanasamy, Caitlin Ward, Sarv Priya, Tanya Aggarwal, Jacob Elam, Prashant Nagpal
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Real world utilization of Dalbavancin at a rural community emergency department
  • Alex Dolan, Elizabeth Kuge, Elisha Bremmer, Tyson Dietrich, Anthony Santarelli, John Ashurst

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.