Single Port vs Multiport Robotic Pyeloplasty: Propensity-Score Matched Analysis of Perioperative and Follow-Up Outcomes - 22/02/22
, Mutahar Ahmed 1, 2, Mubashir Billah 3, Christina Caviasco 2, Nathan Cheng 1, Angeline Sanders 1, Gregory Lovallo 1, 2, Michael Stifelman 1, 2Abstract |
Objectives |
To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of single port (SP) robotic pyeloplasty and multiport (MP) robotic pyeloplasty using a propensity-score matched analysis.
Materials and Methods |
We performed a chart review of all patients who underwent SP robotic pyeloplasty from January 2019 to October 2020 and MP robotic pyeloplasty from January 2016 to October 2020. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. Propensity-score matching was performed on sex, body mass index, and history of previous pyeloplasty to adjust for potential baseline confounders. A post hoc sensitivity analysis for operative time was performed to examine the robustness of the results.
Results |
In total, 24 and 41 patients underwent sSP and MP robotic pyeloplasty, respectively. Following propensity-score matching, 21 MP cases were matched 1:1 to SP cases. The SP group was shown to have longer median operative times (128.0 vs 88.0 minutes, P = .0411) and shorter follow up time (9.3 vs 18.7 months, P = .0066). In a sensitivity analysis, SP robotic pyeloplasty was marginally associated with increased operative time (95% CI -0.25, 29.72, P = .0540).
Conclusions |
SP robotic pyeloplasty is a safe and acceptable alternative to MP robotic pyeloplasty, achieving comparable perioperative and postoperative outcomes.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Financial Disclosure: Robert Harrison, Mubashir Billah, Christina Caviasco, Nathan Cheng, Angeline Sanders, and Gregory Lovallo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Mutahar Ahmed is a consultant for both CONMED and Intuitive Surgical. Michael Stifelman is a lecturer for Intuitive Surgical, on the scientific advisory board for CONMED, consultant for VTI Medical, and has an educational agreement with Ethicon. |
|
| Funding Support: This research did not receive funding from any source. |
Vol 160
P. 124-129 - février 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Evaluation of Routine Postoperative Labs Following Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Normal Preoperative Renal Function
- Amanda A. Myers, Laura E. Geldmaker, Daniela A. Haehn, Colleen T. Ball, David D. Thiel
- EDITORIAL COMMENT
- Christopher Bednarz, Riccardo Autorino
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?