S'abonner

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of a novel Matrix-M-adjuvanted nanoparticle influenza vaccine with a quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in older adults: a phase 3 randomised controlled trial - 23/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00192-4 
Vivek Shinde, MD a, , Iksung Cho, MS a, Joyce S Plested, PhD a, Sapeckshita Agrawal, PhD a, b, Jamie Fiske, MS a, Rongman Cai, PhD a, c, Haixia Zhou, PhD a, Xuan Pham, PhD a, d, Mingzhu Zhu, PhD a, Shane Cloney-Clark, BS a, Nan Wang, MS a, Bin Zhou, PhD a, Maggie Lewis, MS a, Patty Price-Abbott, RN a, Nita Patel, MS a, Michael J Massare, PhD a, Gale Smith, PhD a, Cheryl Keech, MD a, Louis Fries, MD a, Gregory M Glenn, MD a
a Novavax, Gaithersburg, MD, USA 
b Assembly Biosciences, San Francisco, CA, USA 
c Parexel, Billerica, MA, USA 
d AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Gaithersburg, MD, USA 

* Correspondence to: Dr Vivek Shinde, Novavax, 21 Firstfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA Novavax 21 Firstfield Road Gaithersburg MD 20878 USA

Summary

Background

Improved seasonal influenza vaccines for older adults that can induce broadly cross-reactive antibodies and enhanced T-cell responses, particularly against A H3N2 viruses, while avoiding egg-adaptive antigenic changes, are needed. We aimed to show that the Matrix-M-adjuvanted quadrivalent nanoparticle influenza vaccine (qNIV) was immunologically non-inferior to a licensed, standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in older adults.

Methods

This was a phase 3 randomised, observer-blinded, active-comparator controlled trial done across 19 US community-based clinical research sites during the 2019–20 influenza season. Participants were clinically stable and community-dwelling, aged at least 65 years, and were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using an interactive web response system to receive a single intramuscular dose of qNIV or IIV4. The primary objective was to describe safety and show that qNIV was immunologically non-inferior to IIV4. The primary outcomes were adverse events by treatment group and comparative haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody responses (assayed with egg-propagated virus) on day 28, summarised in terms of the ratio of geometric mean titres (GMTRqNIV/IIV4) and seroconversion rate (SCR) difference between participants receiving qNIV or IIV4 for all four vaccine homologous influenza strains. The immunogenicity outcome was measured in the per-protocol population. Non-inferiority was shown if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI on the GMTRqNIV/IIV4 was at least 0·67 and the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI on the SCR difference -was at least −10%. The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04120194, and is active and not recruiting.

Findings

2742 adults were assessed for eligibility and 2654 were enrolled and randomised between Oct 14, 2019, and Oct 25, 2019; 1333 participants were randomised to the qNIV group and 1319 to the IIV4 group (two participants withdrew consent before being assigned to a group). qNIV showed immunological non-inferiority to IIV4: GMTRqNIV/IIV4 for the four vaccine homologous influenza strains was A/Brisbane 1·09 (95% CI 1·03 to 1·15), A/Kansas 1·19 (1·11 to 1·27), B/Maryland 1·03 (0·99 to 1·07), and B/Phuket 1·23 (1·16 to 1·29); and SCR difference was A/Brisbane 5·0 (95% CI 1·9 to 8·1), A/Kansas 7·3 (3·6 to 11·1), B/Maryland 0·5 (−1·9 to 2·9), and B/Phuket 8·5 (5·0 to 11·9). 659 (49·4%) of 1333 of participants in the qNIV group and 551 (41·8%) of 1319 participants in the IIV4 group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. More solicited adverse events were reported by participants in the qNIV group (551 [41·3%] of 1333) than in the IIV4 group (420 [31·8%] of 1319), and were comprised primarily of mild to moderate transient injection site pain (341 [25·6%] in the qNIV group vs 212 [16·1%] in the IIV4 group).

Interpretation

qNIV was well tolerated and produced qualitatively and quantitatively enhanced humoral and cellular immune response in older adults compared with IIV4. qNIV might enhance the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination, and future studies to show clinical efficacy are planned.

Funding

Novavax.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2022  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 1

P. 73-84 - janvier 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Bell’s palsy following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a case series and nested case-control study
  • Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Celine Sze Ling Chui, Francisco Tsz Tsun Lai, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Xue Li, Vincent Ka Chun Yan, Le Gao, Qiuyan Yu, Ivan Chun Hang Lam, Raccoon Ka Cheong Chun, Benjamin John Cowling, Wing Chi Fong, Alexander Yuk Lun Lau, Vincent Chung Tong Mok, Frank Ling Fung Chan, Cheuk Kwong Lee, Lot Sze Tao Chan, Dawin Lo, Kui Kai Lau, Ivan Fan Ngai Hung, Gabriel Matthew Leung, Ian Chi Kei Wong
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Comparison of three tests for latent tuberculosis infection in high-risk people in the USA: an observational cohort study
  • Christine S Ho, Pei-Jean I Feng, Masahiro Narita, Jason E Stout, Michael Chen, Lisa Pascopella, Richard Garfein, Randall Reves, Dolly J Katz, Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium, Jennifer Flood, Lisa Pascopella, Julie Higashi, Kathleen Moser, Marisa Moore, Richard Garfein, Constance Benson, Robert Belknap, Randall Reves, Jason E. Stout, Amina Ahmed, Timothy Sterling, April Pettit, Henry M. Blumberg, Alawode Oladele, Michael Lauzardo, Marie N. Seraphin, Richard Brostrom, Renuka Khurana, Wendy Cronin, Susan Dorman, Masahiro Narita, David Horne, Thaddeus Miller

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.