S'abonner

Clinical Interpretation of Self-Reported Pain Scores in Children with Acute Pain - 21/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.08.071 
Daniel S. Tsze, MD, MPH 1, , Gerrit Hirschfeld, PhD 2, Peter S. Dayan, MD, MSc 1
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 
2 Faculty of Business, CareTech OWL Center for Health, Welfare and Technology, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany 

Reprint requests: Daniel S. Tsze, MD, MPH, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 530 West 166th Street, First Floor, New York, NY 10032Department of Emergency MedicineColumbia University Medical Center530 West 166th StreetFirst FloorNew YorkNY10032

Abstract

Objective

To identify self-reported pain scores that best represent categories of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain in children, and a pain score that accurately represents a child’s perceived need for medication, that is, a minimum pain score at which a child would want an analgesic.

Study design

Prospective cross-sectional cohort study of children aged 6-17 years presenting to a pediatric emergency department with painful and nonpainful conditions. Pain was measured using the 10-point Verbal Numerical Rating Scale. Receiver operating characteristic –based methodology was used to determine pain scores that best differentiated no pain from mild pain, mild pain from moderate pain, and moderate pain from severe pain. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the perceived need for medication.

Results

We analyzed data from 548 children (51.3% female, 61.9% with a painful condition). The scores that best represent categories of pain intensity are as follows: 0-1 for no pain; 2-5 for mild pain; 6-7 for moderate pain; and 8-10 for severe pain. The area under the curve for the cut points differentiating each category ranged from 0.76 to 0.88. The median pain score representing the perceived need for medication was 6 (IQR, 4-7; range, 0-10).

Conclusions

We identified population-level self-reported pain scores in children associated with categories of pain intensity that differ from scores conventionally used. Implementing our findings may provide a more accurate representation of the clinical meaning of pain scores and reduce selection bias in research. Our findings do not support the use of pain scores in isolation for clinical decision making or the use of a pain score threshold to represent a child’s perceived need for medication.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : emergency medicine, emergency department, verbal numerical rating scale, analgesia, perceived need for medication, pain scale, pain intensity, pain assessment

Abbreviations : VNRS


Plan


 Supported by a grant to Columbia University’s Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1TR000040) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and by a grant from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF 01EK1501). These sponsors had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 240

P. 192 - janvier 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics : Genetic Contributions to Psychiatric Illness
  • Philip F. Giampietro
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation and Youth Assault Injuries in Vancouver, Canada
  • Tanjot K. Singh, Mayesha Khan, Gavin Tansley, Herbert Chan, Jeffrey R. Brubacher, John A. Staples

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.