S'abonner

Use of artificial intelligence for gender bias analysis in letters of recommendation for general surgery residency candidates - 09/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.034 
Daniel Sarraf a, Vlad Vasiliu b, Ben Imberman c, Brenessa Lindeman d, e,
a University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA 
b Max Stern College, Emek Yezreel, Israel 
c University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA 
d University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA 
e Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 

Corresponding author. 1808 7th Ave S Boshell Diabetes Building 506 Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.1808 7th Ave S Boshell Diabetes Building 506 BirminghamAL35294USA

Abstract

Background

Letters of recommendation (LoRs) play an important role in resident selection. Author language varies implicitly toward male and female applicants. We examined gender bias in LoRs written for surgical residency candidates across three decades at one institution.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of LoRs written for general surgery residency candidates between 1980 and 2011 using artificial intelligence (AI) to conduct natural language processing (NLP) and sentiment analysis, and computer-based algorithms to detect gender bias. Applicants were grouped by scaled clerkship grades and USMLE scores. Data were analyzed among groups with t-tests, ANOVA, and non-parametric tests, as appropriate.

Results

A total of 611 LoRs were analyzed for 171 applicants (16.4% female), and 95.3% of letter authors were male. Scaled USMLE scores and clerkship grades (SCG) were similar for both genders (p > 0.05 for both). Average word count for all letters was 290 words and was not significantly different between genders (p = 0.18). LoRs written before 2000 were significantly shorter than those written after, among applicants of both genders (female p = 0.004; male p < 0.001). Gender bias analysis of female LoRs revealed more gendered wording compared to male LoRs (p = 0.04) and was most prominent among females with lower SCG (9.5 vs 5.1, p = 0.01). Sentiment analysis revealed male LoRs with female authors had significantly more positive sentiment compared to female LoRs (p = 0.02), and males with higher SCG had more positive sentiment compared to those with lower SCG (9.4 vs 8.2, p = 0.03). NLP detected more “fear” in male LoRs with lower SCGs (0.11 vs 0.09, p = 0.02). Female LoRs with higher SCGs had more positive sentiment (0.78 vs 0.83, p = 0.03) and “joy” (0.60 vs 0.63, p = 0.02), although those written before 2000 had less “joy” (0.5 vs 0.63, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

AI and computer-based algorithms detected linguistic differences and gender bias in LoRs written for general surgery residency applicants, even following stratification by clerkship grades and when analyzed by decade.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Letters of recommendation (LoR) are important in surgical resident selection.
Gender bias can implicitly alter LoR strength.
LoR readers can use artificial intelligence to improve gender bias detection.
Implicit bias detection can provide deeper meaning and guide resident selection.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : LoRs, Gender bias, General surgery residency, Graduate medical education


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 222 - N° 6

P. 1051-1059 - décembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Artificial intelligence and gender bias in hiring surgeons and beyond
  • Tyler J. Loftus, Amalia Cochran
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Relationship between burnout and mistreatment: Who plays a role?
  • Samantha Baker, Frank Gleason, Brendan Lovasik, Gurjit Sandhu, Alexander Cortez, Amy Hildreth, Amanda Cooper, Jon Simmons, Keith A. Delman, Brenessa Lindeman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.