S'abonner

Fifteen-Year Outcomes Following Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Elderly Patients - 06/12/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.07.013 
Yihua Liu, MD, PhD a, b, 1, Mohamed-Yassine Benzha, MD a, 1, Maxime Hubert, MD a, Benjamin Perin, MD a, Giuseppe Lauria, MD a, Pan Dan, MD, PhD a, Elodie Phamisith, MD a, Soukaina Scadi, MD c, Nianguo Dong, MD, PhD b, Jean-Pierre Villemot, MD, PhD a, Juan-Pablo Maureira, MD, PhD a,
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart Transplantation, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France 
b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China 
c Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France 

Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart Transplantation, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, 54500, FranceDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery and Heart TransplantationUniversity Hospital of Nancy-BraboisVandoeuvre-les-Nancy54500France

Abstract

Background

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) techniques have several advantages such as preservation of physiological haemodynamics of the native aortic valve and avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications. However, VSRR procedures are generally performed in young patients and the long-term results in elderly patients (≥65 years) are scarce.

Methods

Fifty-six (56) consecutive patients underwent VSRR surgery by a single surgeon at the current centre between January 2006 and December 2013; a modified “remodelling technique” was typically performed. The mean age was 58.86±12.5 years; Marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve were both present in six patients (10.7%); 38 patients (67.8%) presented with greater than moderate aortic regurgitation; and 17 patients (30.4%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III before surgery. They were divided into two groups according to their ages receiving VSRR surgery: Group E (elderly patients aged ≥65 years, n=24) and Group Y (young patients aged <65 years, n=32). The primary outcomes were aortic valve-related reoperation, cardiovascular reoperation, all-cause mortality, and functional status.

Results

One (1) patient in Group E was converted to aortic valve replacement as a result of a failed aortic valve repair. No perioperative mortality was observed. The mean follow-up was 11.5±2.9 years. Aortic valve-related reoperation was noted in two patients of each group (one with endocarditis, one with severe aortic regurgitation). Cardiovascular reoperations were observed in three and six patients, and all-cause deaths in seven and two patients in Group E and Group Y, respectively. The 10-year freedom from aortic valve-related reoperation was estimated to be 91.7±5.6% and 92.7±5.0% (p=0.594), the 10-year freedom from cardiovascular reoperation was 86.4±7.3% and 81.1±7.7% (p=0.781), and the cumulative 10-year survival rates were 74.0±9.2% and 93.8±4.3% (p=0.018) in Group E and Group Y, respectively. During follow-up, 6.7% of patients were in NYHA class III and 6.4% of patients developed moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. Cox regression analysis failed to identify predictors for primary outcomes.

Conclusion

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement can safely be performed in elderly patients with low early mortality and satisfactory long-term freedom from aortic valve-related and cardiovascular re-intervention.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Valve sparing aortic root replacement, Aortic regurgitation, Aortic root aneurysm


Plan


© 2021  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 31 - N° 1

P. 144-152 - janvier 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Blood Transfusion and Acute Kidney Injury After Total Aortic Arch Replacement for Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection
  • Cheng-Nan Li, Yi-Peng Ge, Hao Liu, Chen-Han Zhang, Yong-Liang Zhong, Su-Wei Chen, Yong-Min Liu, Jun Zheng, Jun-Ming Zhu, Li-Zhong Sun
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Pulmonary Valve Replacement and Redo Pulmonary Valve Replacement via Ministernotomy
  • Jerome Soquet, Valentin Loobuyck, Benjamin Longere, Francois Godart, Guy Vaksmann, Mouhamed Djahoum Moussa, Francis Juthier

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.