S'abonner

Can plain film radiography improve the emergency department detection of clinically important urinary stones? - 30/11/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.074 
Grant D. Innes, MD, MHSc a, , Ian Wishart, MD b , Torey Lau, MD c , Abir Islam, BSc d , Katie Gourlay, BSc e , Frank X. Scheuermeyer, MD, MHSc f
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada 
d University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403-29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada 
e University of Alberta School of Medicine and Dentistry, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada 
f Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Objective

Physicians frequently use ultrasound to assess hydronephrosis in patients with suspected renal colic, but ultrasound has limited diagnostic sensitivity and rarely clarifies stone size or location. Consequently, up to 80% of emergency department (ED) renal colic patients undergo confirmatory CT imaging. Our goal was to estimate x-ray sensitivity for urinary stones and determine whether x-ray substantially improves stone detection (sensitivity) compared to hydronephrosis assessment alone.

Methods

We reviewed imaging reports from all renal colic patients who underwent x-ray and CT at four EDs. For each patient, we documented stone size, location and hydronephrosis severity on CT and whether stones were identified on x-ray. We considered moderate and severe hydronephrosis (MS-Hydro) as significant positive findings, then calculated the sensitivity (detection rate) of MS-Hydro and x-ray for large stones ≥5 mm and for stones likely to require intervention (all ureteral stones >7 mm and proximal or middle stones >5 mm). We then tested a diagnostic algorithm adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment.

Results

Among 1026 patients with 1527 stones, MS-Hydro sensitivity was 39% for large stones and 60% for interventional stones. X-ray sensitivity was 46% for large stones and 52% for interventional stones. Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment increased sensitivity in all stone categories, specifically from 39% to 68% for large stones (gain = 29%; 95%CI, 23% to 35%) and from 60% to 82% for interventional stones (gain = 22%; 95%CI, 13% to 30%). Because CT and ultrasound show strong agreement for MS-Hydro identification, physicians who depend on ultrasound-based hydronephrosis assessment could achieve similar gains by adding x-ray.

Conclusions

Adding x-ray to hydronephrosis assessment substantially improves diagnostic sensitivity, enabling the detection of nearly 70% of large stones and over 80% of interventional stones. This level of sensitivity may be sufficient to reassure physicians about a renal colic diagnosis without CT imaging for many patients.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

X-ray and ultrasound are rapid, inexpensive, low-radiation tests for urinary stones.
Hydronephrosis is more sensitive for interventional stones and ureteral stones.
X-ray is more sensitive for large stones and renal stones.
The combination detects 70% of large stones and over 80% of interventional stones.
Negative results for both tests suggest a low-risk stone not requiring CT imaging.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Nephrolithiasis, Renal colic, Imaging, Diagnosis


Plan


 Renal colic x-ray.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 50

P. 449-454 - décembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication: A meta-analysis
  • Hong-pei Li, Kun-peng Liu, Lan Yao
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Chest compressions during ventilation in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation cause fragmentation of the airflow
  • Cel Van Den Daele, Maxim Vanwulpen, Saïd Hachimi-Idrissi

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.