S'abonner

Concurrent asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adult ED patients: A national perspective - 29/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.081 
Michael W. Tsoulis a, , Brianne Navetta-Modrov b , Henry C. Thode c , Adam J. Singer c
a Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 
b Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA 

Corresponding author at: Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University101 Nicolls RoadStony BrookNY11794USA

Abstract

Objectives

Emergency department (ED) visits for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are common. The designation of Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) has been used to describe patients with features of both diseases. Studies show that ACO patients may be at increased risk of poor outcomes relative to patients with either disease alone. We sought to characterize ED visits and ED-related outcomes of patients with ACO compared to patients with Asthma or COPD alone.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS, 2005–2018) characterizing ED visits in patients ≥35 years of age with Asthma Only, COPD Only or ACO. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for demographics to assess relevant ED outcome variables.

Results

From 2005 to 2018, there were an estimated 8.15, 17.78 and 0.56 million ED visits for Asthma Only, COPD Only and ACO, respectively. ACO patients were younger than COPD Only patients (mean age 50.18 versus 61.79; p < 0.001). ACO patients differed in terms of sex, race and ethnicity from patients with either disease alone. When triaged, Asthma Only (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 11.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20–109.38) patients were more likely to require immediate care than ACO patients. Although admission rates were comparable between groups, ACO patients had a decreased mean length of ED visit compared to both Asthma Only (p < 0.001) and COPD Only (p < 0.05) patients. COPD Only patients were less likely than ACO patients to be seen in the ED in the last 72 h (aOR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.056–0.89), receive nebulizer therapy (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.97), bronchodilators (aOR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12–0.48) and systemic corticosteroids (aOR = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.091–0.35). Asthma Only patients were less likely than ACO patients to undergo any imaging (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31–0.96) and receive antibiotics (aOR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23–0.93).

Conclusions

ACO patients appear to differ demographically from patients with either disease alone in the ED. After adjustment for these demographic differences, ACO patients appear to differ with respect to several ED variables, notably respiratory therapies; however, clinical outcomes including admission and mortality rates appear to be comparable between groups.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Asthma-COPD overlap patients differed demographically from either disease alone.
ED experience of Asthma-COPD overlap patients differs from either disease alone.
Asthma-COPD overlap patients had similar clinical outcomes to either disease alone.
Asthma-COPD overlap patients were more likely to receive medications.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Asthma, COPD, Asthma-COPD overlap, Emergency department, Respiratory therapies, Healthcare utilization


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 49

P. 216-225 - novembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Characteristics of surfers as bystander rescuers in Europe
  • Ingvar Berg, Bart Haveman, Ognjen Markovic, Dion van de Schoot, Jeroen Dikken, Michael Goettinger, Amy E. Peden
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on treatment time for ectopic pregnancy
  • Bethsabee S. Stone, Krithika M. Muruganandan, Melinda M. Tonelli, Julianne N. Dugas, Ivy E. Verriet, Joseph R. Pare

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.