Sécurité et utilité de l’ablation du matériel après ostéosynthèse percutanée des fractures de type A du rachis thoraco-lombaire et lombaire - 29/10/21
Safety and utility of implant removal after percutaneous osteosynthesis of type A thoracolumbar and lumbar fracture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc2b1/cc2b1e6a588071e0fe054b508b1690e3abc899ae" alt=""
Abstract |
Introduction |
Implant removal represents almost one third of all elective surgeries in orthopedics. There is no consensus regarding the time and need to remove the implants after vertebral fractures consolidation. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological effects of implant removal in patients with vertebral type A fracture who underwent a percutaneous intervention.
Material and methods |
We evaluated 31 patients (mean age of 38.2±7.5 years) with thoracolumbar vertebral fracture (T11-L5) who underwent implant removal surgery after 24 months of fracture first surgery by a percutaneous approach. Inclusion criteria focused on patients’ preferences. The radiological parameters included fracture angle, initial sagittal index, compression percentage, degree displacement, deformation angle. The clinical variables included Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability index.
Results |
There was no significant correction loss after removal surgery (before surgery and after 24 months): fracture angle (16.8±0.5 vs. 17.1±0.5; p˃0.05), initial sagittal index (12.5±0.5 vs. 12.7±0.5; p˃0.05), kyphotic deformity (17.5±0.6 vs. 17.8±0.7; p˃0.05), compression percentage (35.6±0.8 vs. 36.0±0.7; p˃0.05), degree displacement (4.4±0.4 vs. 4.5±0.3; p˃0.05) and deformation angle (23.0±0.7 vs. 23.1±0.7; p˃0.05). Patients who presented symptoms before the surgery showed better Visual Analog Scale (1.2±0.6 pre vs. 0.6±0.3 post, p˂0.05) and Oswestry Disability Index (20.1±6.8 pre vs. 15.7±0.5, p˂0.05). No complications were reported.
Discussion |
Routine implant removal in patients undergoing a percutaneous approach to vertebral type A fracture is a safe technique and is associated with good clinical results without loss of radiological correction. In addition, this procedure could be indicated to patients who manifest symptoms since there is a clinical-radiological benefit.
Level of proof |
II; A multicenter prospective cohort study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Implant removal, Vertebral fracture, Percutaneous fixation, Clinical, Radiological, Thoracolumbar unestable fractures
☆ | Cet article peut être consulté in extenso dans la version anglaise de la revue Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research sur Science Direct (sciencedirect.com) en utilisant le DOI ci-dessus. |
Vol 107 - N° 7
P. 900 - novembre 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?