S'abonner

The global incidence of in-flight medical emergencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of approximately 1.5 billion airline passengers - 09/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.010 
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, Clinical Pathologist a, f, , Ana Jerončić, MSc, PhD b, g, ⁎⁎ , Alair Junior Rocha Arantes c, William J. Brady, MD c, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, MSc, PhD d, Núbia Suellen Antunes, PhD a, Guido Carim Junior, PhD e, Milena Soriano Marcolino, MD, MSc, PhD a
a School of Medicine and University Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil 
b Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 
c Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, United States of America 
d Department of Clinical and Social Nutrition, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil 
e School of Engineering and Built Environment/Aviation, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 
f School of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America 
g Cochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia 

Correspondence to: Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, School of Medicine and University Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.School of Medicine and University HospitalFederal University of Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteMinas GeraisBrazil⁎⁎Correspondence to: Ana Jerončić, Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.Department of Research in Biomedicine and HealthUniversity of Split School of MedicineSplitCroatia

Abstract

Background

Medical emergencies during short- or long-haul commercial airline flights have become more commonplace due to the aviation industry's contemporary growth, the popularization of commercial flights, and an increased aging of air travelers with significant comorbidities. However, the precise incidence of onboard medical events on commercial airlines and the most common medical conditions is unclear.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the incidence of in-flight medical emergencies among airline passengers and estimated the incidence rate by physiological body system, or organ class/syndrome for emergencies that may be associated with different body systems. We limited our search to cohort studies published between 1945 to October 31, 2020 in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and official reports from the Federal Aviation Administration/International Air Transport Association, regardless of the language of publication. Only studies that evaluated the overall frequency of onboard medical events on commercial air carriers (in which they also presented the total number of annual revenue passengers) and the frequency of events by physiological body systems or organ class/syndrome were included. We excluded case reports and case series, systematic or narrative reviews, and studies addressing specific health-related conditions. Two independent investigators performed first- and second-phase study screening, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias. We rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Using a quality effect model, we meta-analyzed data associated with the incidence of in-flight medical emergencies, all-cause fatality, incidence of medical events by medical condition category, frequency of en-route diversion, presence of medical personnel on board, and the use of an automatic external defibrillator. We also extracted data regarding the cost of flight diversion.

Results

Of 18 individual studies with approximately 1.5 billion passengers, 11 reported the overall incidence of in-flight medical emergencies. Low certainty of evidence suggested that the global incidence of in-flight medical emergencies was 18.2 events per million passengers (95% CI 0.5 to 53.4 per million; I2 = 100%, P < 0.001, very low certainty), and an all-cause mortality rate was 0.21 per million passengers (95% CI 0 to 0.76 per million; I2 = 99%, P < 0.001, low certainty). The four most common categories of medical conditions or syndromes during flight were syncope, gastrointestinal events, respiratory and neurological diagnostic groups. The diversion rate was 11.1 per 100,000 flights (95% CI 5.9 to17.6 per 100,000 flights; I2 = 97%, P < 0.001), with an average cost ranging from $15,000 to $893,000 per unplanned emergency landing across studies which examined this outcome.

Conclusions

In-flight medical events on commercial travels are extremely low with a corresponding very low in-flight mortality rate. Associated costs derived from en-route diversion might significantly influence airlines' budgetary equilibrium. Novel and modern standardized reporting systems or platforms should be internationally provided and enforced by health and aviation authorities to obtain higher quality patient-passengers datasets. Onboard volunteer medical providers must be aware of everyday life-threatening events during commercial flights and should consider the establishment of a connection between the aircraft and ground-based medical advisory services while assisting in-flight medical events.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : In-flight medical emergencies, Onboard emergency, Aviation medicine, Aerospace medicine, Evidence-based medicine, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Observational studies


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 48

P. 156-164 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The effect of cardiovascular disease and acute cardiac injury on fatal COVID-19: a meta-analysis
  • Jiali Long, Yefei Luo, Yuehong Wei, Chaojun Xie, Jun Yuan
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Haijun Huang, Chenxia Wu, Qinkang Shen, Hua Xu, Yixin Fang, Wei Mao

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.