The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Economics of United States Emergency Care - 23/09/21

US Acute Care Solutions Research Group
Abstract |
Study objective |
We describe how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the economics of emergency department care (ED).
Methods |
We conducted an observational study of 136 EDs from January 2019 to September 2020, using 2020-to-2019 3-week moving ratios for ED visits, complexity, revenue, and staffing expenses. We tabulated 2020-to-2019 staffing ratios and calculated hour and full-time-equivalent changes.
Results |
Following the COVID-19 pandemic’s onset, geriatric (age ≥65), adult (age 18 to 64), and pediatric (age <18) ED visits declined by 43%, 40%, and 73%, respectively, compared to 2019 visits and rose thereafter but remained below 2019 levels through September. Relative value units per visit rose by 8%, 9%, and 18%, respectively, compared to 2019, while ED admission rates rose by 32%. Both fell subsequently but remained above 2019 levels through September. Revenues dropped sharply early in the pandemic and rose gradually but remained below 2019 levels. In medium and large EDs, staffing and expenses were lowered with a lag, largely compensating for lower revenue at these sites, and barely at freestanding EDs. Staffing and expense reductions could not match revenue losses in smaller EDs. During the pandemic, emergency physician and advanced practice provider clinical hours and compensation fell 15% and 27%, respectively, corresponding to 174 lost physician and 193 lost advanced practice provider full-time-equivalent positions.
Conclusion |
The COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted the economics of ED care, with large drops in overall and, in particular, low-acuity ED visits, necessitating reductions in clinical hours. Staffing cutbacks could not match reduced revenue at small EDs with minimum emergency physician coverage requirements.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Please see page 488 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
Supervising editor: Kristin L. Rising, MD, MS. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors. |
|
Author contributions: JMP, MZ, BB, RK, PC, AM, and AV conceived of this study. JMP and AV supervised the study. MZ, BB, and AM provided statistical direction. MZ conducted the analysis and created the graphs. PC provided the data and performed data analyses and quality control. JMP and MS drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. JMP takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
All authors attest to meeting the 4 ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. |
|
Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. |
|
Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide VQN883Z to Annals on this particular article. |
|
A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 78 - N° 4
P. 487-499 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.