Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from healthcare workers’ cellphones - 23/09/21
pages | 7 |
Iconographies | 3 |
Vidéos | 0 |
Autres | 0 |
Highlights |
• | Out of 66 samples, 26 species and 170 microorganisms were isolated from the cellphones of hospital staff. |
• | Staphylococcus spp. (39.4%) and Micrococcus spp. (14.7%) were most frequently isolated. |
• | Gram-positive isolates were all susceptible to the antibiotics used, while Gram-negative isolates were all resistant to ceftazidime. |
• | Cellphones of healthcare staff were highly contaminated with various bacterial agents. |
• | The use of contaminated cellphones in specific medical areas (operating rooms, intensive care units, etc.) is a potential risk for the spread of nosocomial pathogens. |
• | The antibiotic susceptibility profiles of isolates indicate that drug-resistant isolates were transmitted by healthcare staff. |
Abstract |
Objective |
To evaluate bacterial isolates, antibiotic susceptibility, and disease transmission risk in healthcare workers using cellphones.
Methods |
A total of 70 cellphones were received from the hospital staff. Samples were collected from the phones with a sterile cotton swab moistened with physiological saline solution. Samples were inoculated in a bacteriological culture medium and incubated at 37.5°C for 24–48hours. Identification of microorganisms was performed by traditional methods and VITEK 2 device. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used to determine antibiotic susceptibility.
Results |
A total of 26 species and 170 microorganisms were isolated from 66 cellphones from which bacterial growths were obtained: coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=63, 37%) (most commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis: 25/63), Micrococcus luteus (n=25, 14.7%), Tetracoccus (n=24, 14.1%), Kocuria spp. (n=24, 14.1%), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (n=7, 4.1%), Leuconostoc mesenteroides (n=5, 3.0%), S. aureus (n=4, 2.3%), Enterococcus spp. (n=5, 2.9%), Acinetobacter spp. (n=7, 4.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=2, 1.2%), Actinomyces spp. (n=1, 0.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1, 0.6%), Morganella morganii (n=1, 0.6%), and Alcaligenes faecalis (n=1, 0.6%). Gram-positive isolates were all susceptible to the antibiotics used, whereas Gram-negative isolates were all resistant to ceftazidime.
Conclusion |
Hands and/or cellphones of healthcare staff can be contaminated with various types of microorganisms. We recommend proper hand washing and disinfection to prevent bacterial pathogens spread within the hospital.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Healthcare staff, Cellphone, Microbial contamination, Nosocomial infection, Hygiene
Plan
Vol 51 - N° 7
P. 596-602 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?