S'abonner

Public health effects of travel-related policies on the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods systematic review - 21/09/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.017 
Lama Bou-Karroum a, Joanne Khabsa b, Mathilda Jabbour c, Nadeen Hilal c, Zeinab Haidar b, Pamela Abi Khalil b, Rima Abdul Khalek d, Jana Assaf e, Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar f, Clara Abou Samra e, Layal Hneiny g, Sameh Al-Awlaqi h, Johanna Hanefeld i, Fadi El-Jardali a, Elie A. Akl j, , Charbel El Bcheraoui h,
a Center for Systematic Reviews for Health Policy and Systems Research, American University of Beirut, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
b Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Clinical Research Institute, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
c Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
d Economic and Social Commission of Western Asia, P.O. Box 11-8575, Riad el-Solh Square, Beirut, Lebanon 
e Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
f Rafic Hariri School of Nursing, American University of Beirut, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
g Saab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 
h Evidence-Based Public Health Unit, Center for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer. 20, Berlin 13353, Germany 
i Center for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer. 20, Berlin 13353, Germany 
j Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O.Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon 

Correspondence authors.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Highlights

COVID-19 travel policies included border closure, quarantine and, screening travelers.
Border closure should be coupled with other physical distancing policies.
Strict physical distancing measures should accompany relaxing border restrictions.
Monitoring compliance can increase effectiveness of quarantine of travelers.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Summary

Objectives

To map travel policies implemented due to COVID-19 during 2020, and conduct a mixed-methods systematic review of health effects of such policies, and related contextual factors.

Design

Policy mapping and systematic review.

Data sources and Eligibility Criteria

for the policy mapping, we searched websites of relevant government bodies and used data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker for a convenient sample of 31 countries across different regions. For the systematic review, we searched Medline (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and COVID-19 specific databases. We included randomized controlled trial, non-randomized studies, modeling studies, and qualitative studies. Two independent reviewers selected studies, abstracted data and assessed risk of bias.

Results

Most countries adopted a total border closure at the start of the pandemic. For the remainder of the year, partial border closure banning arrivals from some countries or regions was the most widely adopted measure, followed by mandatory quarantine and screening of travelers. The systematic search identified 69 eligible studies, including 50 modeling studies. Both observational and modeling evidence suggest that border closure may reduce the number of COVID-19 cases, disease spread across countries and between regions, and slow the progression of the outbreak. These effects are likely to be enhanced when implemented early, and when combined with measures reducing transmission rates in the community. Quarantine of travelers may decrease the number of COVID-19 cases but its effectiveness depends on compliance and enforcement and is more effective if followed by testing, especially when less than 14 day-quarantine is considered. Screening at departure and/or arrival is unlikely to detect a large proportion of cases or to delay an outbreak. Effectiveness of screening may be improved with increased sensitivity of screening tests, awareness of travelers, asymptomatic screening, and exit screening at country source. While four studies on contextual evidence found that the majority of the public is supportive of travel restrictions, they uncovered concerns about the unintended harms of those policies.

Conclusion

Most countries adopted full or partial border closure in response to COVID-19 in 2020. Evidence suggests positive effects on controlling the COVID-19 pandemic for border closure (particularly when implemented early), as well as quarantine of travelers (particularly with higher levels of compliance). While these positive effects are enhanced when implemented in combination with other public health measures, they are associated with concerns by the public regarding some unintended effects.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Travel restrictions, COVID-19, Screening, Quarantine, Outbreak


Plan


© 2021  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 83 - N° 4

P. 413-423 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Editorial Board
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Characteristics of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli among patients with acute diarrhea in China, 2009?2018
  • Shi-Xia Zhou, Li-Ping Wang, Meng-Yang Liu, Hai-Yang Zhang, Qing-Bin Lu, Lu-Sha Shi, Xiang Ren, Yi-Fei Wang, Sheng-Hong Lin, Cui-Hong Zhang, Meng-Jie Geng, Xiao-Ai Zhang, Yu-Liang Zhu, Zhong-Jie Li, Li-Qun Fang, Wei Liu, Wei-Zhong Yang

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.