S'abonner

Evaluation of digital otoscopy in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial - 29/07/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.030 
Keith Kleinman, MD a, , Kevin J. Psoter, PhD b, Aoibhinn Nyhan, MD c, Barry S. Solomon, MD, MPH b, Julia M. Kim, MD, MPH b, Therese Canares, MD a
a Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, United States of America 
b Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, United States of America 
c Department of Anesthesia Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Pediatric Emergency Department, Suite G1509, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.Johns Hopkins Children's CenterPediatric Emergency DepartmentSuite G1509, 1800 Orleans StreetBaltimoreMD21287United States of America

Abstract

Background

Acute otitis media is often misdiagnosed. Pediatric trainees learn otoscopy from supervisors who cannot concurrently view the eardrum. Digital, smartphone otoscopes show promise to improve the visibility and learning due to a concurrent view by trainees and supervisors. We aimed to determine whether use of digital otoscopes improved accuracy of the ear exams between medical trainees and their supervisors, compared to using traditional otoscopes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the use of digital otoscopes reduced the number of repeat ear examinations by supervisors, changed the trainee's confidence in their exam findings, and led to differences in the rate of antibiotics prescribed.

Methods

This study was a randomized controlled trial comparing use of a digital otoscope to a traditional otoscope, in a pediatric emergency department and primary care clinic in an academic tertiary care children's center. We used a modified validated image-based grading scale to compare accuracy of the ear exam between trainees and supervisors. Surveys documented modified OMgrade scores, frequency of supervisor exams, trainee confidence on a 5-point Likert scale, and antibiotic prescriptions. Inter-rater agreement of trainees and supervisors, the number of supervisor confirmatory examinations performed, trainee confidence, and antibiotic prescription rates were evaluated.

Results

Amongst 188 children, 375 ears were examined by 85 trainees and 22 supervisors. The digital otoscope was utilized in 92 (48.9%) exams and 96 (51.1%) used the traditional otoscope. Accuracy of ear exam findings between trainees and supervisors improved by 11.2% (95% CI: 1.5, 21.8%, p = 0.033) using the Cellscope Oto (74.8%, 95% CI: 67.3, 82.1%) compared to the traditional otoscope (63.5%, 95% CI: 56.7, 70.4%). Fewer repeat supervisor exams were performed in the digital otoscope group (27.2%) vs. the traditional otoscope group (97.9%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean trainee confidence in their examination (p = 0.955) or antibiotic prescription rates when using digital versus traditional otoscopes (p = 0.071).

Conclusions

Utilization of a digital otoscope resulted in increased accuracy of the ear exam between trainees and supervisors, and fewer total number of examinations performed on a given child. Compared to a traditional otoscope, a digital otoscope may be a more efficient and effective diagnostic tool.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Digital otoscopes increase accuracy of trainee otoscopic examination in pediatrics.
Smartphone otoscopy decreases confirmatory examinations performed on children.
Digital otoscopes improve inter-rater agreement in academic pediatric settings.
Digital otoscopy may improve pediatric medical education in academic settings.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Otoscopy, Pediatrics, Digital technology, Emergency department, Smartphone, Healthcare technology


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 46

P. 150-155 - août 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Mitigating the gender gap: How “DOCTOR” badges affect physician identity
  • Jenny Chang, John Arbo, Michael P. Jones, Joshua Silverberg, Jill Corbo
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • QT interval prolongation and the rate of malignant ventricular dysrhythmia and cardiac arrest in adult poisoned patients
  • Lauren B. Robison, William J. Brady, Robert A. Robison, Connor Bracy, Matthew Schneck, Nathan Charlton

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.