Effect of individualized coaching at home on walking capacity in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial (Ticaa’dom) - 29/07/21
Highlights |
• | Individualized coaching at home could limit the physical inactivity in post-stroke. |
• | This coaching personalized did not improve outcome beyond usual care. |
• | Multimodal home-based approach has good potential for wider implementation. |
• | Multimodal home-based approach has good long-term adherence. |
Abstract |
Background |
The gains in walking capacity achieved during rehabilitation often plateau, or are lost, when the patient returns home. Moreover, maintaining or increasing the patient's daily physical activity level after a stroke remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a six-month individualized coaching program at home on walking capacity, as evaluated by the six-minute walk test in subacute stroke patients.
Methods |
Stroke patients in the physical medicine and rehabilitation service participated in a monocentric observer blinded randomized controlled trial with two groups, intervention versus usual care control. The inclusion criteria were: age≥18 years, first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke within<6 months. Participants were randomly assigned (blocks of variable size) to an intervention group (EG) receiving individualized coaching on physical activity, or to a control group (CG) receiving standard care. The six-month program was composed of monitored physical activity, home visits and a weekly phone call. Participants were evaluated after hospital discharge (T0), at the end of the six-month program (T1) and six months later(follow-up; T2). The primary outcome was the walking distance performance, as evaluated with the six-minute walk test at T1.
Results |
Eighty-three participants (age: 61y [IQR=22]; time post-stroke: 2.4 month [IQR=1.7]; Barthel index: 100[IQR=5]) were included in the study: (EG, n=41; CG, n=42). The difference between the two groups was not significant at T1(418m [IQR=165] for the EG and 389m [IQR=188] for the CG; P=0.168) and at T2(425m [IQR=121] for the EG vs. 382m [IQR=219] for the CG; P=0.208).
Conclusion |
Our study shows no difference in the six-minute walk test between the two groups of subacute stroke patients after 6 months of the individualized coaching program, combining home visits, feedback on daily performance and weekly telephone calls. clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT01822938).
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Stroke, Physical exercise, Rehabilitation, Walking, Home care
Plan
Vol 64 - N° 4
Article 101453- juillet 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.