S'abonner

Prevention of influenza during mismatched seasons in older adults with an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 efficacy study - 24/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30694-0 
Jiří Beran, MD a, Humberto Reynales, MD b, Airi Poder, MD c, Charles Y Yu, MD d, Punnee Pitisuttithum, ProfMD e, Lee Li Yuan, MD f, Wim Vermeulen, PhD g, Carole Verhoeven, PhD g, , Brett Leav, MD h, Bin Zhang, PhD h, Daphne Sawlwin, MD i, Esther Hamers-Heijnen, MD g, , Jonathan Edelman, MD j, Igor Smolenov, MD h
a Vaccination and Travel Medicine Centre, Hradec Králové Czech Republic, Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education, Prague, Czech Republic 
b Centro de Atención e Investigación Médica – CAIMED, Bogotá, Colombia 
c Clinical Research Center, Tartu, Estonia 
d De La Salle Health Sciences Institute, De La Salle Angelo King Medical Research Center, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Phillippines 
e Mahidol University, Faculty of Tropical Medcine, Bangkok, Thailand 
f Clinical Research Centre, Seri Manjung, Malaysia 
g Seqirus Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands 
h Seqirus, Cambridge, MA, USA 
i Seqirus Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
j Seqirus USA, Summit, NJ, USA 

* Correspondence to: Dr Carole Verhoeven, Seqirus, 1105 BJ Amsterdam, Netherlands Seqirus Amsterdam BJ 1105 Netherlands

Summary

Background

The absolute degree of protection from influenza vaccines in older adults has not been studied since 2001. This study aimed to show the clinical efficacy of an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) in adults 65 years or older compared with adults not vaccinated to prevent influenza.

Methods

We did a randomised, stratified, observer-blind, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study at 89 sites in 12 countries in 2016–17 northern hemisphere and 2017 southern hemisphere influenza seasons. We enrolled community-dwelling male and female adults aged 65 years and older who were healthy or had comorbidities that increased their risk of influenza complications. We stratified eligible participants by age (cohorts 65–74 years and ≥75 years) and risk of influenza complications (high and low) and randomly assigned them (1:1) via an interactive response technology to receive either aQIV or a non-influenza comparator vaccine. We masked participants and outcome assessors to the administered vaccine. Personnel administering the vaccines did not participate in endpoint assessment. The primary outcome was absolute vaccine efficacy assessed by RT-PCR-confirmed influenza due to any influenza strain in the overall study population (full analysis set) from day 21 to 180 or the end of the influenza season. Vaccine efficacy was calculated on the basis of a Cox proportional hazard regression model for time to first occurrence of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza due to any strain of influenza. Safety outcomes were assessed in the overall study population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02587221.

Findings

Northern hemisphere enrolment occurred between Sept 30, 2016, and Feb 28, 2017, and southern hemisphere enrolment between May 26, 2017, and 30 June 30, 2017. aQIV was administered to 3381 participants, who subsequently had 122 (3·6%) RT-PCR-confirmed influenza cases, and the comparator was administered to 3380 participants, who subsequently had 151 (4·5%) influenza cases. The majority, 214 (78·4%) of 273, were caused by influenza A H3N2. Most antigenically characterised isolates were mismatched to the vaccine strain (118 [85%] of 139). Vaccine efficacy was 19·8% (multiplicity-adjusted 95% CI −5·3 to 38·9) against all influenza and 49·9% (−24·0 to 79·8) against antigenically matched strains, when the protocol definition of influenza-like illness was used. The most common local solicited adverse event was injection site pain, reported by 102 (16·3%) of 624 participants in the aQIV group and 71 (11·2%) of 632 of participants in the comparator group. Deaths were evenly distributed; none were considered related to study vaccines. The safety profile for aQIV was similar to previously reported trials.

Interpretation

The prespecified criterion for showing the efficacy of aQIV in older adults was not met during the influenza seasons with high amounts of vaccine strain mismatch. Vaccine efficacy was higher against influenza cases associated with higher fever, which represent more clinically significant disease.

Funding

Seqirus UK.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 21 - N° 7

P. 1027-1037 - juillet 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Risk predictors of progression to severe disease during the febrile phase of dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Sorawat Sangkaew, Damien Ming, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Kate Honeyford, Siripen Kalayanarooj, Sophie Yacoub, Ilaria Dorigatti, Alison Holmes
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial
  • Jérémy Guenezan, Nicolas Marjanovic, Bertrand Drugeon, Rodérick O Neill, Evelyne Liuu, France Roblot, Paola Palazzo, Vanessa Bironneau, Frederique Prevost, Julie Paul, Maxime Pichon, Matthieu Boisson, Denis Frasca, Olivier Mimoz, CLEAN-3 trial investigators

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.