S'abonner

Single dose perioperative intrathecal ketamine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adult human randomized controlled trials - 14/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110331 
Samantha Sohnen a, , Oonagh Dowling b, Linda Shore-Lesserson b
a Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States of America 
b Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Department of Anesthesiology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, United States of America 

Corresponding author at: Department of Anesthesiology, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03766, United States of America.Department of AnesthesiologyOne Medical Center DriveLebanonNH03766United States of America

Abstract

Study objective

To identify whether adding intrathecal ketamine to intrathecal bupivacaine prolongs the time to first analgesic request in adult humans.

Design

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in humans.

Setting

The majority of data was obtained in an operating room and postoperative recovery area.

Patients

A total of 750 ASA physical status I and II patients were included in the study. Procedures performed include: cesarean section, lower abdominal surgery, lower limb surgery, and urologic surgery.

Interventions

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched. Google Scholar was also queried. Multiple reviewers screened the papers for inclusion.

Measurements

The primary outcome assessed was time to first analgesic request. Secondary outcomes included onset of sensory blockade, onset of motor blockade, duration of sensory blockade, and duration of motor blockade. Data were extracted to include means, 95% confidence intervals, tests for heterogeneity, and use of the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines to assess for publication bias.

Main results

Eleven randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. When comparing intrathecal bupivacaine plus ketamine to intrathecal bupivacaine alone, the time to first analgesic request was prolonged (effect size = 58.23 min (95% CI 37.36 to 79.10) p < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes showed the onset time of sensory blockade was shortened (effect size = −0.87 min (95% CI -1.361 to 0.378) p = 0.0005), the onset time of motor blockade was reduced (effect size = −0.88 min (95% CI -1.77 to 0.013) p = 0.05), the duration of sensory blockade was prolonged (effect size = 39.73 min (95% CI 15.97 to 63.50) p = 0.001), and the duration of motor blockade was prolonged (effect size = 4.02 min (95% CI 3.27 to 4.78) p < 0.0001). Studies were shown to have high heterogeneity. Egger tests for all outcomes were non-significant and funnel plots assessing publication bias were all asymmetrical.

Conclusions

The studies analyzed suggest there may be a benefit to using intrathecal ketamine as an adjunct to bupivacaine. Additional studies are warranted to optimize dosing, clarify the safety and efficacy of this intrathecal drug combination, and examine the various ketamine formulations as intrathecal bupivacaine adjuvants.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Single dose intrathecal injection of both bupivacaine and ketamine can be combined for multimodal analgesia
Perioperative intrathecal ketamine and bupivacaine may improve analgesia compared to intrathecal bupivacaine alone
Intrathecal ketamine and bupivacaine statistically and clinically prolonged the time to first analgesic request
Additional studies are warranted to investigate intrathecal ketamine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine in humans

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 73

Article 110331- octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Too little or too much anesthesia: Age paradox of electroencephalogram indices
  • Sanchit Ahuja, Markus M. Luedi
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The analgesic efficacy of forearm versus upper arm intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's block): A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
  • Kristof Nijs, André Lismont, Gerrit De Wachter, Victoria Broux, Ina Callebaut, Jean-Paul Ory, Hassanin Jalil, Jan Poelaert, Marc Van de Velde, Björn Stessel

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.