S'abonner

Perioperative dexmedetomidine administration to prevent delirium in adults after non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis - 14/06/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110308 
Chaosheng Qin a, b, Yihong Jiang a, Cheng Lin a, Aiguo Li a, Jingchen Liu b,
a Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi, 541001, PR China 
b Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, PR China 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Study objective

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) administration for preventing delirium in adults after non-cardiac surgery.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Interventions

Perioperative administration of DEX to prevent delirium in adults following non-cardiac surgery.

Measurements

The incidence of postoperative delirium (POD).

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register were searched from inception to Mar 4, 2021 for all available RCTs that assessed DEX for POD in adults after non-cardiac surgery. Risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for dichotomous data. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for continuous data. Risk of bias was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (RoB 2.0), and the level of certainty for main outcomes were assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

Main results

Thirteen studies, including the meta-analysis with a total of 4015 patients (DEX group: 2050 patients; placebo group: 1965 patients), showed that DEX significantly reduced the incidence of POD in adults after non-cardiac surgery compared with control group (RR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.46 to 0.77, P = 0.0001, I2 = 55%, GRADE = moderate). Meanwhile, there was a statistical difference by the subgroup analysis between the mean age ≥ 65 years group and the mean age<65 years group. There were no statistical differences in length of hospital stay following surgery (SMD: -0.36; 95%CI: −0.80 to 0.07, P = 0.1, I2 = 97%, GRADE = low) and all-cause mortality rate (RR:0.57; 95%CI: 0.25 to 1.28, P < 0.17, I2 = 0%, GRADE = moderate) compared with placebo group. However, Meta-analysis showed that DEX administration significantly resulted in intraoperative bradycardia when compared with placebo group (RR: 1.39; 95%CI: 1.14 to 1.69, P = 0.0009, I2 = 0%, GRADE = high), and as well as intraoperative hypotension (RR: 1.25; 95%CI: 1.11 to 1.42, P = 0.0004, I2 = 0%, GRADE = high).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that perioperative administration of DEX could significantly reduce the incidence of POD in patients elder than 65 years following non-cardiac surgery. However, there was no definite evidence that perioperative DEX could reduce the incidence of POD in patients younger than 65 years of age after non-cardiac surgery. In addition, perioperative DEX administration was associated with an elevated risk of bradycardia and hypotension.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

This meta-analysis provide more effective and accurate strategies for postoperative delirium in clinical practice.
Perioperative administration of DEX could significantly reduce the risks of POD in adults following non-cardiac surgery.
The elderly appear to more benefit than younger patients from perioperative DEX administration.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Delirium, Dexmedetomidine, Intraoperative, Meta-analysis


Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 73

Article 110308- octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Ultrasound-guided bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in an adult patient with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing spine surgery
  • Tuhin Mistry, Aishwarya Madhav Bhat, Jagannathan Balavenkatasubramanian, Madhanmohan Chandramohan, Kartik Sonawane
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of point-of-care testing for anticoagulation management during ECMO
  • Federica Jiritano, Dario Fina, Roberto Lorusso, Hugo ten Cate, Mariusz Kowalewski, Matteo Matteucci, Raffaele Serra, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.