Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability - 20/05/21
, Adina Landsberg , Anne Nguyen , Sam M. Wiseman ⁎ Abstract |
Background |
Guidelines recommend patient health-related information be written at or below the sixth-grade level. This study evaluates the readability level and quality of online appendectomy patient education materials.
Methods |
Webpages were evaluated using seven readability formulae: Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Automated Readability Index (ARI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), and New Dale-Chall (NDC). Two evaluators assessed quality using the Brief DISCERN tool.
Results |
Thirty seven webpages were analyzed. The mean readability scores were: FKGL = 9.11, GFI = 11.82, CLI = 10.84, ARI = 7.99, SMOG = 11.88, FRE = 51.17, and NDC = 5.48. 6 of the 7 readability formulae indicate that the materials were written at too high a level. The average Brief DISCERN score was 17.81, indicating good quality.
Conclusions |
Readability levels for online appendectomy patient education materials are higher than recommended but are of good quality. Authors of such materials should not only provide good quality information but also ensure readability.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Readability level of online appendectomy patient-education materials is too high. |
• | Readability was at a grade 10 level, when the recommended level should be grade 6. |
• | Quality of these materials was good according to a validated tool (DISCERN). |
• | Authors should follow published readability guidelines to most benefit patients. |
Keywords : Patient education materials, Readability, Quality, Appendicitis, Appendectomy
Plan
Vol 221 - N° 6
P. 1203-1210 - juin 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Optimal oncologic and perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are attainable at a community center
- Colin J. Rog, Gary Lucas, Shelby Reiter, Susan Vetto, Mohamed Alassas, Evan S. Ong
- The impact of obesity on minimally invasive colorectal surgery: A report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program collaborative
- Kenley R. Unruh, Amir L. Bastawrous, Jennifer A. Kaplan, Ravi Moonka, Laila Rashidi, Vlad V. Simianu
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?