Determinants of doctors’ antibiotic prescriptions for patients over 75 years old in the terminal stage of palliative care - 08/05/21
![](/templates/common/images/mail.png)
L’intergroupe GInGer (SPILF SFGG)a, b, d, e, f, g, h, i
pages | 6 |
Iconographies | 1 |
Vidéos | 0 |
Autres | 0 |
Highlights |
• | Population aging and end of life present complex situations that are ever more frequently faced, not only by geriatricians, but also by infectious disease specialists, who are compelled to assess the interest of antibiotherapy in cases of suspected bacterial infection. |
• | There exist no recommendations and only sparse data concerning the attendant issues. |
• | Often called upon for reasoned advice on proper usage of medication, infectologists are not necessarily sensitized to the specificities of end-of-life situations, particularly when they occur in geriatrics. |
• | We are submitting an article drafted subsequent to an investigation conducted in 2016 by the SPILF-SFGG intergroup known as GinGer on the determinants of antibiotherapy use in elderly end-of-life patients by physicians in different practices (town, hospital, EHPAD residence…). |
• | In conjunction with principles for ethical caregiving, the initial results of a pioneering survey can induce each and every one of us, especially the infectologist, to think things over and reconsider his role. |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Notwithstanding high prevalence of presumably bacterial infections in elderly persons (EP) in palliative care (PC), there exists no recommendation on the role of antibiotic therapy (ABP) in this type of situation.
Objective |
To describe the determinants of antibiotic prescription by general practitioners (GP) and by doctors practicing in institutions (DPI) for patients>75 years, in end-of-life situations in PC.
Method |
Descriptive investigation by anonymous self-administered questionnaire disseminated in France by e-mail.
Results |
A total of 301 questionnaires analyzed: 113 GP, 188 DPIs. The latter were mainly geriatricians (69, 36.6%) and infectologists/internists (41, 21.8%). Sixty-three (55,75%) GPs and 144 (78.7%) DPIs stated that they had prescribed antibiotics. Practice in "EHPAD" retirement homes or intensive care was often associated with non-prescription of antibiotics. Age, PC training and number of patients monitored bore no influence. Family involvement in decision-making was more frequent for GPs than for DPIs. The main purpose of antibiotic therapy was to relieve different symptoms (fever, respiratory congestion, functional urinary signs). Most of the doctors (81%) had previously encountered complications (allergy, adverse effect), which represented the main causes of treatment discontinuation.
Conclusion |
Antibiotic use in end-of-life EPs in PC seems frequent. In accordance with the principle of beneficence, its goal of often symptom-related; that said, in the absence of scientific data, antibiotic prescription in end-of-life situations should be individualized in view of observing the other ethical caregiving principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, patient autonomy) and re-evaluated daily.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Palliative care-Terminal care, Aged/Elderly, Anti-bacterial agent
Plan
Vol 51 - N° 4
P. 340-345 - juin 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?