Application of Guideline-Based Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Pressure to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction - 03/05/21
Abstract |
Background |
Early, noninvasive identification of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with congestion may allow timely tailoring of decongestive therapies. The 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines provide an algorithm to assess for elevated left atrial pressure (LAP); the associations of echocardiographic LAP with clinical status and disease progression in patients with HFpEF are unclear.
Methods |
Participants in the Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF trial were categorized into one of four prespecified guideline-based echocardiographic LAP categories: (1) normal, (2) elevated, (3) atrial fibrillation (AF) at the time of echocardiography, or (4) indeterminate. Associations of echocardiographic LAP categories with baseline exercise capacity, change in exercise capacity, and change in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide over 24 weeks were evaluated.
Results |
Of 216 participants, 199 underwent mitral inflow Doppler echocardiography for LAP categorization. Participants with elevated echocardiographic LAP (n = 81) or AF (n = 57) were older and had a higher prevalence of kidney dysfunction. Compared with the normal echocardiographic LAP group (n = 28), elevated echocardiographic LAP and AF were each independently associated with a greater reduction in peak oxygen consumption over 24 weeks after adjusting for baseline values and clinical covariates (β for elevated echocardiographic LAP = −1.55 [95% CI, −2.59 to −0.51], P = .004; β for AF = −1.33 [95% CI, −2.49 to −0.17], P = .03). Indeterminate echocardiographic LAP (n = 33) was also independently associated with a reduction in exercise capacity at 24 weeks compared with normal echocardiographic LAP (β = −1.35; 95% CI, −2.51 to −0.19; P = .02). Finally, elevated echocardiographic LAP and AF were significantly associated with increases in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide over 24 weeks compared with normal echocardiographic LAP.
Conclusions |
In patients with chronic HFpEF, elevated echocardiographic LAP and indeterminate echocardiographic LAP, as defined by contemporary guidelines, and AF were each independently associated with a reduction in exercise capacity compared with normal echocardiographic LAP. These findings suggest the potential utility of noninvasive LAP assessment in patients with HFpEF for tailoring treatments that decrease congestion.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | The 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines allow a simple evaluation of LAP in HFpEF patients. |
• | A high-risk, congested HFpEF phenotype can be identified using the 2016 guidelines. |
• | In HFpEF, elevated LAP is associated with reduction in exercise capacity. |
• | In HFpEF, AF shares characteristics and prognosis with elevated LAP. |
Keywords : Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Echocardiography, Hemodynamics, Atrial fibrillation, Exercise capacity
Abbreviations : AF, ASE, CPET, EACVI, HF, HFpEF, LA, LAP, LAVI, LV, LVEF, NT-proBNP, RELAX, TR, VO2
Plan
Research reported in this article was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award U10 HL084904 and awards U10 HL110297, U10 HL110342, U10 HL110309, U10 HL110262, U10 HL110338, U10 HL110312, U10 HL110302, U10 HL110336, and U10 HL110337. Dr. Patel is supported by the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001424). Dr. Rethy received funding from the Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation (2018–2019). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Shah was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL105755, HL127028, and R01 HL140731 and American Heart Association grants 16SFRN28780016 and 15CVGPSD27260148; has received research grants from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Novartis; and has received consulting fees from Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiora, Eisai, Ironwood, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Tenax, and United Therapeutics. |
Vol 34 - N° 5
P. 455-464 - mai 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?