Comparaison des taux de survie des arthroplasties et des ostéosynthèses pour le traitement des factures basi-cervicales du col fémoral chez des patients ayant des comorbidités multiples - 27/04/21
Comparison of the survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF for basi-cervical femoral neck fractures in the overall population and in polymorbid patients
, Paolo Gaffurini a, Christian Candrian aAbstract |
Background |
Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are associated with high mortality and can be treated with arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). For basi-cervical FNFs there is no agreement on which procedure is better. Do arthroplasty and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) have different rate of survival? Do age and comorbidities influence survivorship?
Hypothesis |
Patients who underwent arthroplasty and patients who underwent ORIF have different rates of survival.
Patients and methods |
Survivorship curves, complications, and hospitalization length were analysed in 154 patients who received hip arthroplasty and in 72 patients who received ORIF. Age and ASA score were used to divide the patients into sub-groups and perform secondary analyses.
Results |
At 4.9±2.4 years after surgery, 74 patients in the arthroplasty group (48%) and 33 in the ORIF group (45%) had died. The survivorship curves of the two groups showed a non-significant difference. The hospitalization length was 13.5±8.9 days, with a non-significant difference between groups. There were 130 complications in total: 97 in the arthroplasty patients (19 patients had multiple complications, 52 had only one), 33 in the ORIF patients (4 patients had multiple complications, 29 had only one); the odds ratio was therefore 2.1 (p=0.02). Age, ASA score, Sernbo score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex (male) were the best predictors of mortality. In the ASA 3–4 sub-group, the survivorship curves showed a lower mortality in the arthroplasty group (p=0.02).
Discussion |
Arthroplasty and ORIF are both valid procedures for the treatment of basi-cervical FNFs, but a high mortality rate is associated with either procedures. There is no difference in terms of survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF in the overall population, but the presence of comorbidities may favour arthroplasty, which should be considered when managing patients with basi-cervical FNFs.
Level of evidence |
III; retrospective, observational study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Hip fractures, Femoral neck fractures, Arthroplasty, ORIF, Survivorship
| ☆ | Cet article peut être consulté in extenso dans la version anglaise de la revue Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research sur Science Direct (sciencedirect.com) en utilisant le DOI ci-dessus. |
Vol 107 - N° 3
P. 366 - mai 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Intérêt du Cone-Beam CT en comparaison du scanner multibarettes conventionnel dans le bilan étiologique de douleurs sur prothèse totale de genou
- Julien Dartus, Thibaut Jacques, Pierre Martinot, Gilles Pasquier, Anne Cotten, Henri Migaud, Vincent Morel, Sophie Putman
- Le lieu de vie préopératoire et le lieu de sortie après la chirurgie des patients victime de fracture du col du fémur influence le taux de mortalité, étude à propos de 1238 patients avec 3 ans de recul minimum
- Roger Erivan, Thomas Hacquart, Guillaume Villatte, Aurélien Mulliez, Stéphane Descamps, Stéphane Boisgard
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?