S'abonner

Myocardial Protection in Adult Cardiac Surgery With del Nido Versus Blood Cardioplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - 09/04/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.10.016 
Satyajeet Misra, MD, DNB, PDCC a, , Anand Srinivasan, MD, DM b, Sritam Swarup Jena, MD, DM a, Snigdha Bellapukonda, MD a
a Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India 
b Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India 

Corresponding author at: Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar 751019, Odisha, IndiaAnesthesiology and Critical CareAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)BhubaneswarOdisha751019India

Abstract

Background

Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery is commonly achieved with either multidose blood cardioplegia or single-dose del Nido crystalloid cardioplegia.

Aim

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of del Nido cardioplegia versus blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery.

Method

All English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar up to March 2020, to identify randomised control trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective analyses (with or without propensity matching) reporting any or all of the primary and secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp (AoX) time; cardioplegia volume; need for defibrillation after AoX release; intraoperative glucose; postoperative myocardial enzyme release; postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS); postoperative blood transfusion; duration of mechanical ventilation; and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay.

Results

Twenty-nine (29) studies were included. There was no difference in the primary outcome of mortality between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82–1.72 [p=0.37]). del Nido cardioplegia was associated with significantly shorter CPB (mean difference [MD], −7.42 minutes; 95% CI, −12.53 to −2.31 [p=0.004]) and AoX times (MD, −6.39 minutes; 95% CI, −10.30 to −2.48 [p=0.001]), and lower cardioplegia volumes. Significantly fewer patients required defibrillation after AoX release in the del Nido group. Intraoperative glucose homeostasis was better preserved in the del Nido group. Postoperative cardiac troponin T release and the number of patients needing transfusions were less in the del Nido group. No differences were seen in postoperative LVEF, or in the incidence of AKI, stroke, AF, and LCOS. Duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of ICU and hospital stay were similar.

Conclusions

Although this meta-analysis failed to find any mortality benefits with del Nido cardioplegia, significant benefits were seen in a number of intraoperative and postoperative variables. del Nido cardioplegia is a safe and favourable alternative to blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Adult cardiac surgery, Blood cardioplegia, del Nido cardioplegia


Plan


© 2020  Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 30 - N° 5

P. 642-655 - mai 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Is Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation the Standard Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Jing Wang, Yanling Wang, Tao Wang, Xiaokang Xing, Ge Zhang
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Correlation Between Doppler Echocardiography and Right Heart Catheterisation-Derived Systolic and Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressures: Determinants of Discrepancies Between the Two Methods
  • Andrea Sonaglioni, Roberto Cassandro, Francesca Luisi, Daniela Ferrante, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Michele Lombardo, Claudio Anzà, Sergio Harari

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.