S'abonner

Immunogenicity and safety of simplified vaccination schedules for the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine in healthy individuals aged 9–50 years (CYD65): a randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study - 25/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30767-2 
Diana Leticia Coronel-MartÍnez, MD a, , Juliana Park, MD b, Eduardo López-Medina, MD c, María Rosario Capeding, MD d, Andrés Angelo Cadena Bonfanti, MD e, María Cecilia Montalbán, MD f, Isabel Ramírez, MD g, María Liza Antoinette Gonzales, ProfMD h, Carlos A DiazGranados, MD i, j, Betzana Zambrano, MD k, Gustavo Dayan, MD i, Stephen Savarino, MD i, Zhenghong Chen, PhD l, Hao Wang, MPH l, Sunny Sun, PhD l, Matthew Bonaparte, PhD i, Andrey Rojas, MD m, Jenny Carolina Ramírez, MSc m, Mae Ann Verdan, MDC n, Fernando Noriega, MD i
a Sanofi Pasteur, Santa Catarina, Coyoacán, Mexico City, Mexico 
b Sanofi Pasteur, Singapore 
c Centro de Estudios en Infectología Pediátrica, Universidad del Valle and Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia 
d Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Filinvest Corporate City, Alabang, Muntinlupa, Metro Manila, Philippines 
e Clinica de la Costa, Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia 
f Manila Doctors Hospital, Ermita, Metro Manila, Philippines 
g Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia 
h University of the Philippines Manila—Philippine General Hospital, Ermita, Metro Manila, Philippines 
i Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA 
j Sanofi Pasteur, Marcy L’Etoile, France 
k Sanofi Pasteur, Montevideo, Uruguay 
l Sanofi Pasteur, Chaoyang, Beijing, China 
m Sanofi Pasteur, Bogotá, Colombia 
n Sanofi Pasteur, Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines 

* Correspondence to: Dr Diana Leticia Coronel-Martínez, Sanofi Pasteur, Santa Catarina, Coyoacán, 04000 Ciudad de México, Mexico Sanofi Pasteur Santa Catarina Coyoacán 04000 Ciudad de México Mexico

Summary

Background

Three doses of the licensed tetravalent dengue vaccine CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon France) are immunogenic and effective against symptomatic dengue in individuals aged 9 years and older who are dengue seropositive. Previous trials have provided some evidence that antibody responses elicited after just one dose or two doses of CYD-TDV might be similar to those elicited after three doses. We compared antibody responses following one-dose, two-dose, and three-dose vaccination regimens in individuals who were dengue seropositive at baseline up to 1 year after the last injection.

Methods

In this randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study (CYD65), healthy individuals aged 9–50 years were recruited from the community in three sites in Colombia and three sites in the Philippines. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a permuted block method with stratification by site and age group, to receive, at 6-month intervals (on day 0, month 6, and month 12), three doses of CYD-TDV (three-dose group), one dose of placebo (on day 0) and two doses of CYD-TDV (at months 6 and 12; two-dose group), or two doses of placebo (on day 0 and month 6) and one dose of CYD-TDV (at month 12; one-dose group). Each dose of CYD-TDV was 0·5 mL, administered subcutaneously into the deltoid of the upper arm. Participants, study staff, investigators, and the funder were masked to group assignment. The co-primary endpoints were geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies against each dengue virus serotype at 28 days and 1 year after the last vaccine injection. After a protocol amendment during the conduct of the study, the original co-primary objectives of non-inferiority of the one-dose and two-dose groups to the three-dose group were altered to include non-inferiority of the two-dose group to the three-dose group only, to be assessed in individuals who were dengue seropositive at baseline. Non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the ratio of GMTs (GMR) at 28 days and 1 year between groups was more than 0·5 for each serotype. The analysis of the coprimary objectives was done in the per-protocol analysis dataset, which included all participants who had been vaccinated, had no protocol deviations, and had a valid serology test result for at least one dengue serotype at 28 days after the third injection. Safety was assessed throughout in all participants who received at least one injection of study drug, regardless of serostatus. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02628444, and is closed to accrual.

Findings

Between May 2, 2016, and Sept 16, 2016, we recruited and enrolled 1050 individuals, of whom 1048 received at least one injection and 993 had at least one blood sample taken (full-analysis dataset; 333 in three-dose group, 328 in two-dose group, and 332 in one-dose group). 860 (86·6%) of 993 participants in the full-analysis dataset were dengue seropositive at baseline. Non-inferiority (two dose vs three dose) was shown for each serotype at both 28 days and 1 year among dengue-seropositive participants (number of participants assessed: 272 [two-dose group], 265 [three-dose group] at 28 days; and 190 [two-dose group], 185 [three-dose group] at 1 year). At 28 days after the last injection, neutralising antibody GMTs were 899 (95% CI 752–1075) in the two-dose group versus 822 (700–964) in the three dose group against dengue serotype 1 (GMR 1·09 [95% CI 0·86–1·39]); 869 (754–1002) versus 875 (770–995) against serotype 2 (GMR 0·99 [0·82–1·20]); 599 (524–685) versus 610 (535–694) against serotype 3 (GMR 0·98 [0·82–1·18]); and 510 (453–575) versus 531 (470–601) against serotype 4 (GMR 0·96 [0·81–1·14]). At year 1, GMTs had decreased but remained above baseline for all serotypes: 504 (95% CI 403–630) in the two-dose group versus 490 (398–604) in the three-dose group against serotype 1 (GMR 1·03 [0·76–1·40]); 737 (611–888) versus 821 (704–957) against serotype 2 (GMR 0·90 [0·71–1·14]); 437 (368–519) versus 477 (405–561) against serotype 3 (GMR 0·92 [0·72–1·16]); and 238 (205–277) versus 270 (235–310) against serotype 4 (GMR 0·88 [0·72–1·09]). Reactogenicity profiles were similar across treatment groups. Most unsolicited adverse events after any injection were non-serious and systemic in nature. During the study, 60 serious adverse events were reported in 58 participants (14 in three-dose group, 26 in two-dose group, 18 in one-dose group), mostly infection and infestations or injury, poisoning, and procedural complications. No serious adverse events of special interest or admissions to hospital for dengue occurred. Two deaths occurred, unrelated to study treatment.

Interpretation

A two-dose CYD-TDV regimen might be an alternative to the licensed three-dose regimen in individuals who are dengue seropositive at baseline and aged 9 years and older. Vaccination with a reduced number of doses could lead to improved vaccine compliance and coverage, especially in low-resource settings.

Funding

Sanofi Pasteur.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 21 - N° 4

P. 517-528 - avril 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Longitudinal antibody and T cell responses in Ebola virus disease survivors and contacts: an observational cohort study
  • Ruth Thom, Thomas Tipton, Thomas Strecker, Yper Hall, Joseph Akoi Bore, Piet Maes, Fara Raymond Koundouno, Sarah Katharina Fehling, Verena Krähling, Kimberley Steeds, Anitha Varghese, Graham Bailey, Mary Matheson, Saidou Kouyate, Moussa Coné, Balla Moussa Keita, Sekou Kouyate, Amento Richard Ablam, Lies Laenen, Valentijn Vergote, Malcolm Guiver, Joseph Timothy, Barry Atkinson, Lisa Ottowell, Kevin S Richards, Andrew Bosworth, Stephanie Longet, Jack Mellors, Delphine Pannetier, Sophie Duraffour, César Muñoz-Fontela, Oumou Sow, Lamine Koivogui, Edmund Newman, Stephan Becker, Armand Sprecher, Herve Raoul, Julian Hiscox, Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo, Keita Sakoba, N’Faly Magassouba, Stephan Günther, Mandy Kader Konde, Miles W Carroll
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Accuracy and efficacy of pre-dengue vaccination screening for previous dengue infection with five commercially available immunoassays: a retrospective analysis of phase 3 efficacy trials
  • Carlos A DiazGranados, Matthew Bonaparte, Hao Wang, Ming Zhu, Yaniv Lustig, Eli Schwartz, Remi Forrat, Gustavo H Dayan, Shekema Hodge, Yasemin Ataman-Önal, Stephen J Savarino

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.