S'abonner

Exposure and confidence across critical airway procedures in pediatric emergency medicine: An international survey study - 24/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.075 
Joshua Nagler, MD MHPEd a, b, c, , Marc Auerbach, MD MSCI d, e, Michael C. Monuteaux, ScD a, b, John A. Cheek, MBBS f, g, h, Franz E. Babl, MD MPH f, g, h, i, Ed Oakley, MBBS f, g, h, i, Lucia Nguyen, MBBS j, Arjun Rao, MBBS MAppSci h, k, l, m, Sarah Dalton, BMed MMgtHlth h, n, Mark D. Lyttle, MBCHB o, p, q, Santiago Mintegi, MD, PhD r, s, t, u, Rakesh D. Mistry, MD, MS e, v, Andrew Dixon, MD w, x, y, z, Pedro Rino, MD aa, ab, ac, Guillermo Kohn-Loncarica, MD aa, ab, ac, Stuart R. Dalziel, MBChB PhD h, ad, ae, Simon Craig, MHPE MPH h, af, ag

the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN)1

  Participating networks include: the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics (PEM-CRC), Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC), Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI), Pediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM), and Red de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediátrica Latinoaméricana (RIDEPLA).

a Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
b Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 
c Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), USA 
d Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA 
e Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEM-CRC), USA 
f Emergency Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
g Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 
h Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT), Australia and New Zealand 
i University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 
j Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia 
k Sydney Children's Hospital (Randwick), NSW, Australia 
l University of New South Wales, Australia 
m Health Education Training Institute (HETI), New South Wales, Australia 
n The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia 
o Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK 
p Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK 
q Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom & Ireland (PERUKI), UK 
r Pediatric Emergency Department, Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain 
s University of the Basque Country, Spain 
t Research in European Pediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM), Spain 
u Red de Investigación de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias de Pediatría/Spanish Pediatric Emergency Research Group (RISeuP/SPERG), Spain 
v Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA 
w University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
x Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 
y Women's and Children's Health Research Institute, Canada 
z Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC), Canada 
aa Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina 
ab Hospital de Pediatría “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Buenos Aires, Argentina 
ac Red de Investigación y Desarrollo de la Emergencia Pediátrica Latinoamericana (RIDEPLA), Argentina 
ad Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 
ae Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 
af Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia 
ag Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Australia 

Corresponding author at: Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.Division of Emergency MedicineBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02115USA

Abstract

Background

Airway management procedures are critical for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, but rarely performed skills in pediatric patients. Worldwide experience with respect to frequency and confidence in performing airway management skills has not been previously described.

Objectives

Our aims were 1) to determine the frequency with which emergency medicine physicians perform airway procedures including: bag-mask ventilation (BMV), endotracheal intubation (ETI), laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, tracheostomy tube change (TTC), and surgical airways, and 2) to investigate predictors of procedural confidence regarding advanced airway management in children.

Methods

A web-based survey of senior emergency physicians was distributed through the six research networks associated with Pediatric Emergency Research Network (PERN). Senior physician was defined as anyone working without direct supervision at any point in a 24-h cycle. Physicians were queried regarding their most recent clinical experience performing or supervising airway procedures, as well as with hands on practice time or procedural teaching. Reponses were dichotomized to within the last year, or ≥ 1 year. Confidence was assessed using a Likert scale for each procedure, with results for ETI and LMA stratified by age. Response levels were dichotomized to “not confident” or “confident.” Multivariate regression models were used to assess relevant associations.

Results

1602 of 2446 (65%) eligible clinicians at 96 PERN sites responded. In the previous year, 1297 (85%) physicians reported having performed bag-mask ventilation, 900 (59%) had performed intubation, 248 (17%) had placed a laryngeal mask airway, 348 (23%) had changed a tracheostomy tube, and 18 (1%) had performed a surgical airway. Of respondents, 13% of physicians reported the opportunity to supervise but not provide ETI, 5% for LMA and 5% for BMV. The percentage of physicians reporting “confidence” in performing each procedure was: BMV (95%) TTC (43%), and surgical airway (16%). Clinician confidence in ETT and LMA varied by patient age. Supervision of an airway procedure was the strongest predictor of procedural confidence across airway procedures.

Conclusion

BMV and ETI were the most commonly performed pediatric airway procedures by emergency medicine physicians, and surgical airways are very infrequent. Supervising airway procedures may serve to maintain procedural confidence for physicians despite infrequent opportunities as the primary proceduralist.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 42

P. 70-77 - avril 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
  • Daniel Martin Simadibrata, Julius Calvin, Alya Darin Wijaya, Naufal Arkan Abiyyu Ibrahim
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on visits of an urban emergency department
  • Gül?ah Ç?kr?kç? I??k, Yunsur Çevik

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.