S'abonner

Prospective validation of the bedside sonographic acute cholecystitis score in emergency department patients - 24/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.12.085 
Sally Graglia, MD, MPH a, Hamid Shokoohi, MD, MPH b, , Michael A. Loesche, MD, PhD b, Daniel Dante Yeh, MD, MHPE c, Rachel M. Haney, MD, MSHPEd d, Calvin K. Huang, MD, MPH b, Christina C. Morone, MHS, PA-C b, Caitlin Springer, MHS, PA-C b, Heidi H. Kimberly, MD e, f, Andrew S. Liteplo, MD b
a Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSF-ZSFG, UCSF Medical School, San Francisco, CA, USA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 
c Ryder Trauma Center, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami, USA 
d Department of Emergency Medicine, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, WA, USA 
e Department of Emergency Medicine, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA 
f Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 

Corresponding author at: 326 Cambridge Street, Suite 410, Boston, MA 02114, USA.326 Cambridge StreetSuite 410BostonMA02114USA

Abstract

Background

Acute cholecystitis can be difficult to diagnose in the emergency department (ED); no single finding can rule in or rule out the disease. A prediction score for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis for use at the bedside would be of great value to expedite the management of patients presenting with possible acute cholecystitis. The 2013 Tokyo Guidelines is a validated method for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis but its prognostic capability is limited. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate the Bedside Sonographic Acute Cholecystitis (SAC) Score utilizing a combination of only historical symptoms, physical exam signs, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) findings for the prediction of the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in ED patients.

Method

This was a prospective observational validation study of the Bedside SAC Score. The study was conducted at two tertiary referral academic centers in Boston, Massachusetts. From April 2016 to March 2019, adult patients (≥18 years old) with suspected acute cholecystitis were enrolled via convenience sampling and underwent a physical exam and a focused biliary POCUS in the ED. Three symptoms and signs (post-prandial symptoms, RUQ tenderness, and Murphy's sign) and two sonographic findings (gallbladder wall thickening and the presence of gallstones) were combined to calculate the Bedside Sonographic Acute Cholecystitis (SAC) Score. The final diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was determined from chart review or patient follow-up up to 30 days after the initial assessment. In patients who underwent operative intervention, surgical pathology was used to confirm the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the Bedside SAC Score were calculated for various cut off points.

Results

153 patients were included in the analysis. Using a previously defined cutoff of ≥ 4, the Bedside SAC Score had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI 73.9%–96.9%), and a specificity of 67.5% (95% CI 58.2%–75.9%). A Bedside SAC Score of < 2 had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 90.3%–100%) and specificity of 35% (95% CI 26.5%–44.4%). A Bedside SAC Score of ≥ 7 had a sensitivity of 44.4% (95% CI 27.9%–61.9%) and specificity of 95.7% (95% CI 90.3%–98.6%).

Conclusion

A bedside prediction score for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis would have great utility in the ED. The Bedside SAC Score would be most helpful as a rule out for patients with a low Bedside SAC Score < 2 (sensitivity of 100%) or as a rule in for patients with a high Bedside SAC Score ≥ 7 (specificity of 95.7%). Prospective validation with a larger study is required.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Cholecystitis, Point-of-care ultrasound, Emergency department, Clinical decision rules, Sonographic acute cholecystitis


Plan


© 2020  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 42

P. 15-19 - avril 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The burden of the pandemic on the non-SARS-CoV-2 emergencies: A multicenter study
  • Milton Steinman, Jorge Henrique Bento de Sousa, Francisco Tustumi, Nelson Wolosker
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Hyperthermia associated with methamphetamine and cocaine use
  • Catherine A. Marco, Kunal Gupta, Janet Lubov, Aisha Jamison, Brian Patrick Murray

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.