S'abonner

High-dose versus standard-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial - 02/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30742-7 
Bjørn Henning Grønberg, ProfMD a, b, , Kristin Toftaker Killingberg, MD a, b, Øystein Fløtten, MD c, Odd Terje Brustugun, MD d, Kjersti Hornslien, MD e, Tesfaye Madebo, PhD f, Seppo Wang Langer, MD g, h, Tine Schytte, PhD i, j, Jan Nyman, MD k, l, Signe Risum, MD g, Georgios Tsakonas, MD m, Jens Engleson, MD n, Tarje Onsøien Halvorsen, MD a, b
a Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 
b Department of Oncology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway 
c Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 
d Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust, Drammen, Norway 
e Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway 
f Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway 
g Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark 
h Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark 
i Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark 
j Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark 
k Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden 
l Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 
m Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden 
n Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 

* Correspondence to: Prof Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim 7491 Norway

Summary

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for limited stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions is considered to be the most effective schedule. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-dose, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 40 fractions improves survival.

Methods

This open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial was done at 22 public hospitals in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment-naive confirmed limited stage SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2, and measurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 were eligible. All participants received four courses of intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (area under the curve 5–6 mg/mL × min, Calvert’s formula) on day 1 and intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1–3 every 3 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) in permuted blocks (sized between 4 and 10) stratifying for ECOG performance status, disease stage, and presence of pleural effusion to receive thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions or 60 Gy in 40 fractions to the primary lung tumour and PET-CT positive lymph node metastases starting 20–28 days after the first chemotherapy course. Patients in both groups received two fractions per day, ten fractions per week. Responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation of 25–30 Gy. The primary endpoint, 2-year overall survival, was assessed after all patients had been followed up for a minimum of 2 years. All randomly assigned patients were included in the efficacy analyses, patients commencing thoracic radiotherapy were included in the safety analyses. Follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02041845.

Findings

Between July 8, 2014, and June 6, 2018, 176 patients were enrolled, 170 of whom were randomly assigned to 60 Gy (n=89) or 45 Gy (n=81). Median follow-up for the primary analysis was 49 months (IQR 38–56). At 2 years, 66 (74·2% [95% CI 63·8–82·9]) patients in the 60 Gy group were alive, compared with 39 (48·1% [36·9–59·5]) patients in the 45 Gy group (odds ratio 3·09 [95% CI 1·62–5·89]; p=0·0005). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (72 [81%] of 89 patients in the 60 Gy group vs 62 [81%] of 77 patients in the 45 Gy group), neutropenic infections (24 [27%] vs 30 [39%]), thrombocytopenia (21 [24%] vs 19 [25%]), anaemia (14 [16%] vs 15 [20%]), and oesophagitis (19 [21%] vs 14 [18%]). There were 55 serious adverse events in 38 patients in the 60 Gy group and 56 serious adverse events in 44 patients in the 45 Gy group. There were three treatment-related deaths in each group (one neutropenic fever, one aortic dissection, and one pneumonitis in the 60 Gy group; one thrombocytic bleeding, one cerebral infarction, and one myocardial infarction in the 45 Gy group).

Interpretation

The higher radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy resulted in a substantial survival improvement compared with 45 Gy, without increased toxicity, suggesting that twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy is an alternative to existing schedules.

Funding

The Norwegian Cancer Society, The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 3

P. 321-331 - mars 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiotherapy services in England, UK: a population-based study
  • Katie Spencer, Christopher M Jones, Rebecca Girdler, Catherine Roe, Michael Sharpe, Sarah Lawton, Louise Miller, Philippa Lewis, Mererid Evans, David Sebag-Montefiore, Tom Roques, Rebecca Smittenaar, Eva Morris
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • 4 Gy versus 24 Gy radiotherapy for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma (FoRT): long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
  • Peter Hoskin, Biliana Popova, Oliver Schofield, Caroline Brammer, Martin Robinson, A Murray Brunt, Krishnaswamy Madhavan, Tim Illidge, Eve Gallop-Evans, Isabel Syndikus, Laura Clifton-Hadley, Amy A Kirkwood

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.