S'abonner

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiotherapy services in England, UK: a population-based study - 02/03/21

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30743-9 
Katie Spencer, PhD a, c, , Christopher M Jones, MRCP a, b, c, Rebecca Girdler, PGCE d, Catherine Roe, MSc d, Michael Sharpe, BSc d, Sarah Lawton, MPH d, Louise Miller, MA d, Philippa Lewis, FRCR e, f, Mererid Evans, PhD g, David Sebag-Montefiore, ProfFRCR a, c, Tom Roques, FRCR f, h, Rebecca Smittenaar, PhD d, Eva Morris, ProfPhD i
a Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 
b Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 
c Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK 
d National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, UK 
e NHS England, London, UK 
f Royal College of Radiologists, London, UK 
g Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK 
h Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK 
i Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 

* Correspondence to: Dr Katie Spencer, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT UK

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Summary

Background

The indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer outcomes is of increasing concern. However, the extent to which key treatment modalities have been affected is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on radiotherapy activity in England.

Methods

In this population-based study, data relating to all radiotherapy delivered for cancer in the English NHS, between Feb 4, 2019, and June 28, 2020, were extracted from the National Radiotherapy Dataset. Changes in mean weekly radiotherapy courses, attendances (reflecting fractions), and fractionation patterns following the start of the UK lockdown were compared with corresponding months in 2019 overall, for specific diagnoses, and across age groups. The significance of changes in radiotherapy activity during lockdown was examined using interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis.

Findings

In 2020, mean weekly radiotherapy courses fell by 19·9% in April, 6·2% in May, and 11·6% in June compared with corresponding months in 2019. A relatively greater fall was observed for attendances (29·1% in April, 31·4% in May, and 31·5% in June). These changes were significant on ITS analysis (p<0·0001). A greater reduction in treatment courses between 2019 and 2020 was seen for patients aged 70 years or older compared with those aged younger than 70 years (34·4% vs 7·3% in April). By diagnosis, the largest reduction from 2019 to 2020 in treatment courses was for prostate cancer (77·0% in April) and non-melanoma skin cancer (72·4% in April). Conversely, radiotherapy courses in April, 2020, compared with April, 2019, increased by 41·2% in oesophageal cancer, 64·2% in bladder cancer, and 36·3% in rectal cancer. Increased use of ultra-hypofractionated (26 Gy in five fractions) breast radiotherapy as a percentage of all courses (0·2% in April, 2019, to 60·6% in April, 2020; ITS p<0·0001) contributed to the substantial reduction in attendances.

Interpretation

Radiotherapy activity fell significantly, but use of hypofractionated regimens rapidly increased in the English NHS during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. An increase in treatments for some cancers suggests that radiotherapy compensated for reduced surgical activity. These data will assist health-care providers in understanding the indirect consequences of the pandemic and the role of radiotherapy services in minimising these consequences.

Funding

None.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2021  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 22 - N° 3

P. 309-320 - mars 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • From periwinkle to an enduring anticancer drug
  • Guy Faguet
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • High-dose versus standard-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
  • Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Kristin Toftaker Killingberg, Øystein Fløtten, Odd Terje Brustugun, Kjersti Hornslien, Tesfaye Madebo, Seppo Wang Langer, Tine Schytte, Jan Nyman, Signe Risum, Georgios Tsakonas, Jens Engleson, Tarje Onsøien Halvorsen

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.