S'abonner

Utilization of the electrocardiogram in the pediatric emergency department - 24/02/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.070 
Carly Theiler, MD a, b, , 1 , Joseph Arms, MD a, Gretchen Cutler, PhD a, Ernest Krause, MS a, David Burton, MD a, c
a Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA 
b University of Iowa, Department of Emergency Medicine, IA, USA 
c Children's Heart Clinic, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA 

Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, 1008 RCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Iowa200 Hawkins Dr1008 RCPIowa CityIA52242USA

Abstract

Objective

Review pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) result severity classification and describe the utilization of ECG testing, and rate of clinically significant results, in the pediatric emergency department (PED).

Methods

This was a review of patients ≤18 years who had an ECG performed in a tertiary children's hospital PED 2005–2017. Using established guidelines and expert consultation, ECG results were categorized: Class 0 = normal, Class I = mild abnormality (no cardiology follow-up), Class II = moderate abnormality (cardiology follow-up), Class III = severe abnormality (immediate intervention). Chi-square tests were used to examine differences between patients with clinically insignificant (Class 0/I) and clinically significant (Class II/III) results. Multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with clinically significant results.

Results

16,147 unique PED encounters with ECG performed were included for analysis. The most common ECG indications were chest pain (32.5%), syncope (22.0%), arrhythmia (11.8%), toxicology/ingestion (9.4%), and seizure (5.7%). Overall, 12.7% (n = 2056) of ECGs had clinically significant (Class II/III) results, and only 2.0% (n = 325) had severe abnormality (Class III) that would require immediate intervention or cardiologist input. Factors associated with increased odds of clinically significant ECG were age ≤ 1 year (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02–1.41), male (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20–1.46), and indications of arrhythmia (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.59–2.13), cardiac (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.99–3.31), blank indication (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17–1.98), and electrolyte abnormality (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03–1.95).

Conclusions

In this study, we provided a valuable review of ECG result severity classification in the pediatric population. We found that chest pain and syncope represented over half of all ECGs performed. We found that clinically significant results are rare in the pediatric population at 12.7% of all ECGs performed, and very few (2.0%) have severe abnormalities that would require immediate intervention. Those with increased odds of a clinically significant ECG include young patients ≤1 year of age, male patients, and certain ECG indications.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Pediatric electrocardiogram results can be classified based on clinical severity.
Review of this classification promotes better understanding of pediatric results.
Clinically significant electrocardiogram results are rare in the pediatric population.
Only 2% of pediatric electrocardiograms required emergency intervention.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Pediatric, Pediatric emergency medicine, PEM, Electrocardiogram, ECG, EKG

Abbreviations : Electrocardiogram, pediatric emergency department, electronic medical record, odds ratio, confidence interval, AV block, bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, premature atrial contraction, premature ventricular contraction, right ventricular, left ventricular, right ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular hypertrophy, biventricular hypertrophy, supraventricular tachycardia, wolff-parkinson-white, apparent life-threatening event, altered mental status, left axis deviation


Plan


© 2020  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 41

P. 21-27 - mars 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Analgesic efficacy of the serratus anterior plane block in rib fractures pain: A randomized controlled trial
  • ?eyma Tek?en, Gözen Öksüz, Hafize Öksüz, Muhammed Sayan, Mahmut Arslan, Aykut Urfal?o?lu, Gökçe Gi?i, Bora Bilal
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Barriers to point-of-care ultrasound utilization during cardiac arrest in the emergency department: a regional survey of emergency physicians
  • Mallika R. Singh, Jennifer S. Jackson, Mark A. Newberry, Cameron Riopelle, Vu Huy Tran, Leila L. PoSaw

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.