Synthesis of systematic reviews of percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) for prevention of recurrent cryptogenic stroke: Redundant publications and methodological deficiencies - 23/01/21
Doi : 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.051
Mustafa Husaini, MD a, b, c, Amir Esmaeeli, MD b, c, Manoj Thangam, MD a, b, c, Michelle Doering, MLS c, David L. Brown, MD a, b, c, ⁎ 
a Cardiovascular Division, St Louis, MO
b Department of Medicine, St Louis, MO
c Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
⁎Reprint requests: David L. Brown, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8086, St Louis, MO 63110.Cardiovascular DivisionWashington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8086St LouisMO63110
Résumé |
Critical assessments of systemic reviews and meta-analyses have found them to often be redundant, lacking in novel perspectives, of poor methodological quality, and written by authors with potential conflicts of interest. We sought to investigate these issues as they relate to systemic reviews and meta-analyses of percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure for the prevention of recurrent cryptogenic stroke.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Funding: none |
|
| Disclosures: none |
© 2020
Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 232
P. 57-60 - février 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Impact of chronic total occlusion and revascularization strategy in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: A subanalysis of the culprit-shock trial
- Nassim Braik, Paul Guedeney, Micheal Behnes, Steffen Desch, Olivier Barthélémy, Marcus Sandri, Suzanne de Waha-Thiele, Georg Fuernau, Stéphanie Rouanet, Marie Hauguel-Moreau, Michel Zeitouni, Pavel Overtchouk, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Schneider, Uwe Zeymer, Holger Thiele, Gilles Montalescot, Ibrahim Akin
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?