Impact of sex on management and survival in aortic stenosis - 09/01/21
Résumé |
Aims |
Increasing attention has been paid to sex differences in recent studies, but only a few have focused on such differences in aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to evaluate the differences between genders in AS outcomes and management.
Methods and results |
We included 2429 patients(51.5% men; 49.5% women) with severe AS. Women were olde r(P<0.001), more often symptomatic(P=0.007), and presented with smaller aortic valve area(P<0.001), and greater ejection fraction(P<0.001) than men. Despite that women have a longer life expectancy than men in the general population, estimated five-year survival of patients with severe AS was lower for women compared to men(62±2% versus 69±1% respectively, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was lower compared to expected survival, especially for women (62±2% vs. 71% for women and 69±1% vs. 71% for men). The cumulative 5-years incidence of aortic valve replacement (AVR) was 79±2% for men, and only 70±2% for women (P<0.001) and, being male was independently predictive of AVR (OR:1.49 [1.18–1.97]; P=0.011). After age-matching, women still presented with more symptoms (P=0.004), lower AVR rates (64.4% versus 69.1%, P=0.018) and lower 5-year survival than men (66±2%[expected:75%] versus 68±2% [expected 70%], P<0.001) (Fig. 1).
Conclusion |
Women with severe AS present at a more advance stage of the disease, at older ages with more symptoms, and incur higher mortality than men. This excess mortality is related to a combination of late diagnosis and a less frequent and later referral for AVR than in men. This justifies appropriate measures to improve the situation and to ensure that both sexes receive equivalent care.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 13 - N° 1
P. 69-70 - janvier 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.