S'abonner

Improved Testing and Design of Intubation Boxes During the COVID-19 Pandemic - 18/12/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.08.033 
David M. Turer, MD, MS a, , Cameron H. Good, PhD c, Benjamin K. Schilling, MS d, Robert W. Turer, MD, MSE f, Nicholas R. Karlowsky, BS g, Lucas A. Dvoracek, MD a, Heng Ban, PhD e, Jason S. Chang, MD b, J. Peter Rubin, MD a, d
a Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 
b Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 
c US Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 
d Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
e Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 
f Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 
g Filtech, Inc., Homestead, PA 

Corresponding Author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Abstract

Study objective

Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, many emergency departments have been using passive protective enclosures (“intubation boxes”) during intubation. The effectiveness of these enclosures remains uncertain. We sought to quantify their ability to contain aerosols using industry standard test protocols.

Methods

We tested a commercially available passive protective enclosure representing the most common design and compared this with a modified enclosure that incorporated a vacuum system for active air filtration during simulated intubations and negative-pressure isolation. We evaluated the enclosures by using the same 3 tests air filtration experts use to certify class I biosafety cabinets: visual smoke pattern analysis using neutrally buoyant smoke, aerosol leak testing using a test aerosol that mimics the size of virus-containing particulates, and air velocity measurements.

Results

Qualitative evaluation revealed smoke escaping from all passive enclosure openings. Aerosol leak testing demonstrated elevated particle concentrations outside the enclosure during simulated intubations. In contrast, vacuum-filter-equipped enclosures fully contained the visible smoke and test aerosol to standards consistent with class I biosafety cabinet certification.

Conclusion

Passive enclosures for intubation failed to contain aerosols, but the addition of a vacuum and active air filtration reduced aerosol spread during simulated intubation and patient isolation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 2 for the Editor’s Capsule Summary of this article.
 Supervising editor: William R. Mower, MD, PhD. Specific detailed information about possible conflict of interest for individual editors is available at editors.
 Author contributions: DMT, CHG, BKS, NRK, LAD, HB, JSC, and JPR were responsible for study conceptualization and design. DMT, CHG, RWT, NRK, and JSC were responsible for literature review. DMT, CHG, BKS, RWT, NRK, HB, JSC, and JPR were responsible for data analysis and interpretation of results. DMT, CHG, RWT, JSC, and JPR were responsible for article development and review. DMT and CHG contributed equally to this work. DMT takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 All authors attest to meeting the four ICMJE.org authorship criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; AND (3) Final approval of the version to be published; AND (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). Drs. D. M. Turer, Good, Dvoracek, Ban, Chang, and Rubin and Mr. Schilling are named as inventors on a patent application assigned to the University of Pittsburgh. This work was supported by a University of Pittsburgh Center for Medical Innovation Grant (F_309-2020-Turer).
 Readers: click on the link to go directly to a survey in which you can provide Z3HWJ26 to Annals on this particular article.


© 2020  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 77 - N° 1

P. 1-10 - janvier 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Global Research Highlights
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Normocellular Community-Acquired Bacterial Meningitis in Adults: A Nationwide Population-Based Case Series
  • Hannah Holm Vestergaard, Lykke Larsen, Christian Brandt, Birgitte R. Hansen, Christian Ø. Andersen, Hans R. Lüttichau, Jannik Helweg-Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Merete Storgaard, Henrik Nielsen, Jacob Bodilsen

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.